Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32165361›Full record

ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2020

Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Z Shi, B Hu, U J Schoepf, R H Savage, D M Dargis, C W Pan, X L Li, Q Q Ni, G M Lu, L J Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Computational fluid dynamics and shape analysis enhance aneurysm rupture risk stratification.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Z ShiFrom the Department of Medical Imaging (Z.S., B.H., Q.Q.N., G.M.L., L.J.Z.), Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9427-9609
B HuFrom the Department of Medical Imaging (Z.S., B.H., Q.Q.N., G.M.L., L.J.Z.), Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6074-4322
U J SchoepfDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging (U.J.S., R.H.S., D.M.D.), Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-6164-5641
R H SavageDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging (U.J.S., R.H.S., D.M.D.), Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-6167-4939
D M DargisDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging (U.J.S., R.H.S., D.M.D.), Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-9950-9071
C W PanDeepWise AI Lab (C.W.P., X.L.L.), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0497-7903
X L LiDeepWise AI Lab (C.W.P., X.L.L.), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3377-892X
Q Q NiFrom the Department of Medical Imaging (Z.S., B.H., Q.Q.N., G.M.L., L.J.Z.), Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4230-5059
G M LuFrom the Department of Medical Imaging (Z.S., B.H., Q.Q.N., G.M.L., L.J.Z.), Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4913-2314
L J ZhangFrom the Department of Medical Imaging (Z.S., B.H., Q.Q.N., G.M.L., L.J.Z.), Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China kevinzhlj@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6664-7224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial aneurysms with subarachnoid hemorrhage lead to high morbidity and mortality. It is of critical importance to detect aneurysms, identify risk factors of rupture, and predict treatment response of aneurysms to guide clinical interventions. Artificial intelligence has received worldwide attention for its impressive performance in image-based tasks. Artificial intelligence serves as an adjunct to physicians in a series of clinical settings, which substantially improves diagnostic accuracy while reducing physicians' workload. Computer-assisted diagnosis systems of aneurysms based on MRA and CTA using deep learning have been evaluated, and excellent performances have been reported. Artificial intelligence has also been used in automated morphologic calculation, rupture risk stratification, and outcomes prediction with the implementation of machine learning methods, which have exhibited incremental value. This review summarizes current advances of artificial intelligence in the management of aneurysms, including detection and prediction. The challenges and future directions of clinical implementations of artificial intelligence are briefly discussed.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansIntracranial Aneurysm

Identifiers

PMID32165361
PMCPMC7077887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.