Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32165206›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2020

Comprehensive Molecular and Pathologic Evaluation of Transitional Mesothelioma Assisted by Deep Learning Approach: A Multi-Institutional Study of the International Mesothelioma Panel from the MESOPATH Reference Center.

Francoise Galateau Salle, Nolwenn Le Stang, Franck Tirode, Pierre Courtiol, Andrew G Nicholson, Ming-Sound Tsao, Henry D Tazelaar, Andrew Churg, Sanja Dacic, Victor Roggli and 44 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Advances in the Basic Sciences in Thoracic Oncology in the Last 20 Years and Their Translational Impact.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CDKN2A deletion is associated with immune desertification in diffuse pleural mesothelioma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Immunotherapy approaches for malignant pleural mesothelioma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pleural mesothelioma classification-update and challenges.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Review
  18. Molecular characterization of pleomorphic mesothelioma: a multi-institutional study.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  19. Solid papillary mesothelial tumor.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  20. Deep-learning based classification distinguishes sarcomatoid malignant mesotheliomas from benign spindle cell mesothelial proliferations.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

54 authors.

Francoise Galateau SalleMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France. Electronic address: francoise.galateau@lyon.unicancer.fr.
Nolwenn Le StangMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.
Franck TirodeUniversity Claude Bernard Lyon, INSERM, CNRS, Research Cancer Center of Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Pierre CourtiolOWKIN Paris, France.
Andrew G NicholsonDepartment of Histopathology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Ming-Sound TsaoUniversity Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Henry D TazelaarMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Andrew ChurgColumbia University and Department of Pathology Vancouver, Canada.
Sanja DacicFISH and Developmental Laboratory at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Victor RoggliDuke University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Durham, North Carolina.
Daniel PissalouxDepartment of BioPathology-FISH Laboratory, Centre Leon Berard Lyon, France.
Charles MaussionOWKIN Paris, France.
Matahi MoariiOWKIN Paris, France.
Mary Beth BeasleyMount-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York.
Hugues BegueretCHU Bordeaux, Haut Leveque Hospital, Department of Pathology, Bordeaux, France.
David B ChapelUniversity of Chicago, Department of Pathology, Chicago, Illinois.
Marie Christine CopinUniversity. Lille-CHU, Department of Pathology, Lille, France.
Allen R GibbsUniversity of Wales, Department of Cellular Pathology, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Sonja KlebeDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Sylvie LantuejoulMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.
Kazuki NabeshimaDepartment of Pathology, Fukuoka University School of Medicine and Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Jean-Michel VignaudCHU Nancy, INSERM, University of Lorraine, Lorraine, France.
Richard AttanoosUniversity of Wales, Department of Cellular Pathology, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Luka BrcicDepartment of Pathology, Graz, Austria.
Frederique CapronCHU Pitié Salpétrière Paris, Department of Pathology, Paris, France.
Lucian R ChirieacBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Francesca DamiolaMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.
Ruth SequeirosMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.
Aurélie CazesMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Bichat Department of Pathology, University Paris VII, Paris, France.
Diane DamotteMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Cochin-Hotel Dieu, Department of Pathology, Paris, France.
Armelle FouletMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CH Le Mans, Department of Pathology, Pays de la Loire, France.
Sophie Giusiano-CourcambeckMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Hospital Nord, Marseille, University Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France.
Kenzo HiroshimaTokyo Women's Medical University, Department of Pathology, Tokyo, Japan.
Veronique HofmanMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona; CHU Nice, Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathology (LPCE), Nice, France.
Aliya N HusainUniversity of Chicago, Department of Pathology, Chicago, Illinois.
Keith KerrAberdeen Royal Infirmary, Department of Pathology, Aberdeen, Scotland.
Alberto MarchevskyScotland Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Los Angeles, California.
Severine PaindavoineUniversity Claude Bernard Lyon, INSERM, CNRS, Research Cancer Center of Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Jean Michel PicquenotMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Department of Pathology, Henri Becquerel Centre, Rouen, France.
Isabelle RouquetteMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; IUCT-Oncopôle, Department of Pathology, Toulouse, France.
Christine SaganMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Nantes, INSERM, Thorax Institute, Hôpital Laënnec CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Jennifer SauterMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York.
Francoise ThivoletMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Hospices Civils, East Hospital Group, Department of Pathology, Lyon, France.
Marie BrevetMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Hospices Civils, East Hospital Group, Department of Pathology, Lyon, France.
Philippe RouvierCHU Pitié Salpétrière Paris, Department of Pathology, Paris, France.
William D TravisMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York.
Gaetane PlanchardMESOPATH, MESONAT, MESOBANK Department of BioPathology Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Department of Pathology, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
Birgit WeynandUZ Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas ClozelOWKIN Paris, France.
Gilles WainribOWKIN Paris, France.
Lynnette Fernandez-CuestaGenetic Cancer Susceptibility Group International Agency for Research on Cancer World Health Organization, Lyon, France.
Jean-Claude PaironINSERM, UPEC, Faculty of Medicine and CHI Creteil, Professional Pathologies and Environment Department, IST-PE, Creteil, France.
Valerie RuschMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic Surgery, New York, New York.
Nicolas GirardDepartment of Thoracic Oncology Institute Curie Paris, France and European Reference Network EURACAN, Centre Leon Berard, France.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHistologic subtypes of malignant pleural mesothelioma are a major prognostic indicator and decision denominator for all therapeutic strategies. In an ambiguous case, a rare transitional mesothelioma (TM) pattern may be diagnosed by pathologists either as epithelioid mesothelioma (EM), biphasic mesothelioma (BM), or sarcomatoid mesothelioma (SM). This study aimed to better characterize the TM subtype from a histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular standpoint. Deep learning of pathologic slides was applied to this cohort.

methodsA random selection of 49 representative digitalized sections from surgical biopsies of TM was reviewed by 16 panelists. We evaluated BAP1 expression and CDKN2A (p16) homozygous deletion. We conducted a comprehensive, integrated, transcriptomic analysis. An unsupervised deep learning algorithm was trained to classify tumors.

resultsThe 16 panelists recorded 784 diagnoses on the 49 cases. Even though a Kappa value of 0.42 is moderate, the presence of a TM component was diagnosed in 51%. In 49% of the histological evaluation, the reviewers classified the lesion as EM in 53%, SM in 33%, or BM in 14%. Median survival was 6.7 months. Loss of BAP1 observed in 44% was less frequent in TM than in EM and BM. p16 homozygous deletion was higher in TM (73%), followed by BM (63%) and SM (46%). RNA sequencing unsupervised clustering analysis revealed that TM grouped together and were closer to SM than to EM. Deep learning analysis achieved 94% accuracy for TM identification.

conclusionThese results revealed that the TM pattern should be classified as non-EM or at minimum as a subgroup of the SM type.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsMesotheliomaHomozygoteHumansSequence DeletionTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin ThiolesteraseBAP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin ThiolesteraseHistologyMesotheliomaSurgerySystemic treatment

Identifiers

PMID32165206
PMCPMC8864581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.