Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32164692›Full record

SynthesisImplementation science : IS2020

Evaluating and optimizing the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) for use in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Arianna Rubin Means, Christopher G Kemp, Marie-Claire Gwayi-Chore, Sarah Gimbel, Caroline Soi, Kenneth Sherr, Bradley H Wagenaar, Judith N Wasserheit, Bryan J Weiner

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 236 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
236citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06075108 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

P-KIDs CARE: An Intervention to Address Health Systems Delays to Care for Injured Children in Tanzania

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2024 to 2028Enrolled284ConditionsAccidental Injuries, Global Child Health, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Public Health System ResearchArmsP-KIDs CARE
NCT06803316 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Optimizing Care Delivery to Support Reengagement in PLWH Returning to HIV Care After Treatment Lapses in Zambia

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCentre for Infectious Disease Research in ZambiaRan2022 to 2025Enrolled658ConditionsHIV Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Adherence
NCT07132905 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Pilot Trial of Church-Based Problem-Solving Therapy for Adolescent Girls and Young Women With a History of Gender-Based Violence in Zambia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2025 to 2026Enrolled180ConditionsHIV, Common Mental Health Problems, PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Depression DisorderArmsMpata Yathu ("Our Space")
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

236 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

176 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arianna Rubin MeansDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. aerubin@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4087-7080
Christopher G KempDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marie-Claire Gwayi-ChoreDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sarah GimbelDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Caroline SoiDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kenneth SherrDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bradley H WagenaarDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Judith N WasserheitDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bryan J WeinerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Strengthening the identification and treatment of depression in primary care in MozambiqueK01MH110599 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WAGENAAR, BRADLEY · 2017 to 2020
$633k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH110599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a determinants framework that may require adaptation or contextualization to fit the needs of implementation scientists in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The purpose of this review is to characterize how the CFIR has been applied in LMIC contexts, to evaluate the utility of specific constructs to global implementation science research, and to identify opportunities to refine the CFIR to optimize utility in LMIC settings.

methodsA systematic literature review was performed to evaluate the use of the CFIR in LMICs. Citation searches were conducted in Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. Data abstraction included study location, study design, phase of implementation, manner of implementation (ex., data analysis), domains and constructs used, and justifications for use, among other variables. A standardized questionnaire was sent to the corresponding authors of included studies to determine which CFIR domains and constructs authors found to be compatible with use in LMICs and to solicit feedback regarding ways in which CFIR performance could be improved for use in LMICs.

resultsOur database search yielded 504 articles, of which 34 met final inclusion criteria. The studies took place across 21 countries and focused on 18 different health topics. The studies primarily used qualitative study designs (68%). Over half (59%) of the studies applied the CFIR at study endline, primarily to guide data analysis or to contextualize study findings. Nineteen (59%) of the contacted authors participated in the survey. Authors unanimously identified culture and engaging as compatible with use in global implementation research. Only two constructs, patient needs and resources and individual stages of change were commonly identified as incompatible with use. Author feedback centered on team level influences on implementation, as well as systems characteristics, such as health system architecture. We propose a "Characteristics of Systems" domain and eleven novel constructs be added to the CFIR to increase its compatibility for use in LMICs.

conclusionsThese additions provide global implementation science practitioners opportunities to account for systems-level determinants operating independently of the implementing organization. Newly proposed constructs require further reliability and validity assessments.

trial registrationPROSPERO, CRD42018095762.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesImplementation ScienceHealth Care RationingHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansOrganizational CultureReproducibility of ResultsConsolidated Framework for Implementation ResearchGlobal healthHealth systemsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32164692
PMCPMC7069199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.