Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32164669›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2020

Variations in factors associated with healthcare providers' intention to engage in interprofessional shared decision making in home care: results of two cross-sectional surveys.

Rhéda Adekpedjou, Julie Haesebaert, Dawn Stacey, Nathalie Brière, Adriana Freitas, Louis-Paul Rivest, France Légaré

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02244359 (Improving the Decision Making Process About Location of Care With the Frail Elderly and Their Caregivers), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02244359 nacompletednot on this map

Improving the Decision Making Process About Location of Care With the Frail Elderly and Their Caregivers

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHU de Quebec-Universite LavalRan2014 to 2016Enrolled455ConditionsDecision Process About the Location of Care Among Frail ElderlyArmsTraining, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Teamwork in home care nursing: A scoping literature review.Health & social care in the community · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rhéda AdekpedjouCentre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Julie HaesebaertUniversité de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université Saint-Étienne, HESPER EA 7425, F-69008 Lyon, F-42023, Saint-Etienne, France.
Dawn StaceyOttawa Hospital Research Institute and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Nathalie BrièreCentre intégré universitaire en santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Canada.
Adriana FreitasCentre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Louis-Paul RivestDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
France LégaréCentre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Quebec, Canada. France.Legare@mfa.ulaval.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-6696
Université Laval · CABombardier Recreational Products (Canada) · CACentres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services Sociaux · CAUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Canadian Frailty Network MFE-140842Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux 13-SS-00431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDOLCE (Improving Decision making On Location of Care with the frail Elderly and their caregivers) was a post-intervention clustered randomised trial (cRT) to assess the effect of training home care teams on interprofessional shared decision-making (IP-SDM). Alongside the cRT, we sought to monitor healthcare providers' level of behavioural intention to engage in an IP-SDM approach and to identify factors associated with this intention.

methodsWe conducted two cross-sectional surveys in the province of Quebec, Canada, one each at cRT entry and exit. Healthcare providers (e.g. nurses, occupational therapists and social workers) in the 16 participating intervention and control sites self-completed an identical paper-based questionnaire at entry and exit. Informed by the Integrated model for explaining healthcare professionals' clinical behaviour by Godin et al. (2008), we assessed their behavioural intention to engage in IP-SDM to support older adults and caregivers of older adults with cognitive impairment to make health-related housing decisions. We also assessed psychosocial variables underlying their behavioural intention and collected sociodemographic data. We used descriptive statistics and linear mixed models to account for clustering.

resultsBetween 2014 and 2016, 271 healthcare providers participated at study entry and 171 at exit. At entry, median intention level was 6 in a range of 1 (low) to 7 (high) (Interquartile range (IQR): 5-6.5) and factors associated with intention were social influence (β = 0.27, P <  0.0001), beliefs about one's capabilities (β = 0.43, P <  0.0001), moral norm (β = 0.31, P <  0.0001) and beliefs about consequences (β = 0.21, P <  0.0001). At exit, median intention level was 5.5 (IQR: 4.5-6.5). Factors associated with intention were the same but did not include moral norm. However, at exit new factors were kept in the model: working in rehabilitation (β = - 0.39, P = 0.018) and working as a technician (β = - 0.41, P = 0.069) (compared to as a social worker).

conclusionIntention levels were high but decreased from entry to exit. Factors associated with intention also changed from study entry to study exit. These findings may be explained by the major restructuring of the health and social care system that took place during the 2 years of the study, leading to rapid staff turnover and organisational disturbance in home care teams. Future research should give more attention to contextual factors and design implementation interventions to withstand the disruption of system- and organisational-level disturbances.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov (NCT02244359). Registered on September 19th, 2014.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedIntentionAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth PersonnelHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuebecClustered randomised trialContextHome careImplementationInterprofessional shared decision-makingSocio-cognitive theory

Identifiers

PMID32164669
PMCPMC7069220
OpenAlexW3012465551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.