Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32164668›Full record

SynthesisBMC palliative care2020

When a child dies: a systematic review of well-defined parent-focused bereavement interventions and their alignment with grief- and loss theories.

Eline M Kochen, Floor Jenken, Paul A Boelen, Laura M A Deben, Jurrianne C Fahner, Agnes van den Hoogen, Saskia C C M Teunissen, Karin Geleijns, Marijke C Kars

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. From loss to meaning: therapeutic group processes in parental grief after pediatric cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Parental grief: a qualitative analysis of gratitude.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Meeting the emotional and behavioral health needs of bereaved NICU parents.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eline M KochenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands. e.m.kochen@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-6234
Floor JenkenDepartment Woman and Baby, Wilhelmina Childrens Hospital, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Paul A BoelenDepartment of clinical psychology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laura M A DebenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jurrianne C FahnerJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Agnes van den HoogenDepartment Woman and Baby, Wilhelmina Childrens Hospital, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Saskia C C M TeunissenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Karin GeleijnsJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marijke C KarsJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLWilhelmina Children's Hospital · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

ZonMw 844001506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of interventions for bereaved parents have increased. However, most are practice based. To enhance the implementation of bereavement care for parents, an overview of interventions which are replicable and evidence-based are needed. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of well-defined bereavement interventions, focused on the parents, and delivered by regular health care professionals. Also, we explore the alignment between the interventions identified and the concepts contained in theories on grief in order to determine their theoretical evidence base.

methodA systematic review was conducted using the methods PALETTE and PRISMA. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. We included articles containing well-defined, replicable, paediatric bereavement interventions, focused on the parent, and performed by regular health care professionals. We excluded interventions on pathological grief, or interventions performed by healthcare professionals specialised in bereavement care. Quality appraisal was evaluated using the risk of bias, adapted risk of bias, or COREQ. In order to facilitate the evaluation of any theoretical foundation, a synthesis of ten theories about grief and loss was developed showing five key concepts: anticipatory grief, working models or plans, appraisal processes, coping, and continuing bonds.

resultsTwenty-one articles were included, describing fifteen interventions. Five overarching components of intervention were identified covering the content of all interventions. These were: the acknowledgement of parenthood and the child's life; establishing keepsakes; follow-up contact; education and information, and; remembrance activities. The studies reported mainly on how to conduct, and experiences with, the interventions, but not on their effectiveness. Since most interventions lacked empirical evidence, they were evaluated against the key theoretical concepts which showed that all the components of intervention had a theoretical base.

conclusionsIn the absence of empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of most interventions, their alignment with theoretical components shows support for most interventions on a conceptual level. Parents should be presented with a range of interventions, covered by a variety of theoretical components, and aimed at supporting different needs. Bereavement interventions should focus more on the continuous process of the transition parents experience in readjusting to a new reality.

trial registrationThis systematic review was registered in Prospero (registration number: CRD42019119241).

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathGriefAdaptation, PsychologicalHospice CareHumansParentingParentsPsychological TheorySocial SupportBereavementInterventionsModels theoreticalPaediatricsParentsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32164668
PMCPMC7068872
OpenAlexW3010675606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.