ArticleBMC biology2020
Performance analysis of novel toxin-antidote CRISPR gene drive systems.
Article in BMC biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experimental and modeling demonstration of stronger population suppression by gene drive targeting doublesex from dominant female-sterile resistance alleles.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Seed dormancy shapes gene drive dynamics in plants.Nature plants · 2026Article
- Genetic engineering for SIT application: a fruit fly-focused review.Insect science · 2026Review
- Synthetic Biology of Plants and Microbes for Agriculture, Environment, and Future Applications.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Predicting the invasiveness of threshold-dependent gene drives.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Synthetic homing endonuclease gene drives to revolutionise Aedes aegypti biocontrol - game changer or pipe dream?Current opinion in insect science · 2025Review
- Maximising Eradication Potential of Rat Gene Drives Using a Two-Target Homing Rescue Strategy: Spatial Modelling of Empirical Data.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- A Comparative Assessment of Self-limiting Genetic Control Strategies for Population Suppression.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Ecology of Gene Drives: The Role of Density-Dependent Feedbacks on the Efficacy and Dynamics of Two-Locus Underdominance Gene Drive Systems.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Engineering drive-selection balance for localized population suppression with neutral dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Controlling the frequency dynamics of homing gene drives for intermediate outcomes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Improving the suppressive power of homing gene drive by co-targeting a distant-site female fertility gene.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Population suppression with dominant female-lethal alleles is boosted by homing gene drive.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Cleave and Rescue gamete killers create conditions for gene drive in plants.Nature plants · 2024Article
- Performance characteristics allow for confinement of a CRISPR toxin-antidote gene drive for population suppression in a reaction-diffusion model.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Overriding Mendelian inheritance in Arabidopsis with a CRISPR toxin-antidote gene drive that impairs pollen germination.Nature plants · 2024Article
- Germline Cas9 promoters with improved performance for homing gene drive.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Cleave and Rescue gamete killers create conditions for gene drive in plants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Transformative Approaches for Sustainable Weed Management: The Power of Gene Drive and CRISPR-Cas9.Genes · 2023Review
- Manipulating the Destiny of Wild Populations Using CRISPR.Annual review of genetics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCRISPR gene drive systems allow the rapid spread of a genetic construct throughout a population. Such systems promise novel strategies for the management of vector-borne diseases and invasive species by suppressing a target population or modifying it with a desired trait. However, current homing-type drives have two potential shortcomings. First, they can be thwarted by the rapid evolution of resistance. Second, they lack any mechanism for confinement to a specific target population. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive performance assessment of several new types of CRISPR-based gene drive systems employing toxin-antidote (TA) principles, which should be less prone to resistance and allow for the confinement of drives to a target population due to invasion frequency thresholds.
resultsThe underlying principle of the proposed CRISPR toxin-antidote gene drives is to disrupt an essential target gene while also providing rescue by a recoded version of the target as part of the drive allele. Thus, drive alleles tend to remain viable, while wild-type targets are disrupted and often rendered nonviable, thereby increasing the relative frequency of the drive allele. Using individual-based simulations, we show that Toxin-Antidote Recessive Embryo (TARE) drives targeting an haplosufficient but essential gene (lethal when both copies are disrupted) can enable the design of robust, regionally confined population modification strategies with high flexibility in choosing promoters and targets. Toxin-Antidote Dominant Embryo (TADE) drives require a haplolethal target gene and a germline-restricted promoter, but they could permit faster regional population modification and even regionally confined population suppression. Toxin-Antidote Dominant Sperm (TADS) drives can be used for population modification or suppression. These drives are expected to spread rapidly and could employ a variety of promoters, but unlike TARE and TADE, they would not be regionally confined and also require highly specific target genes.
conclusionsOverall, our results suggest that CRISPR-based TA gene drives provide promising candidates for flexible ecological engineering strategies in a variety of organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.