Trial reportBMC public health2020
Time-efficient and computer-guided sprint interval exercise training for improving health in the workplace: a randomised mixed-methods feasibility study in office-based employees.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of a Novel Workplace-based Exercise Intervention: a Pilot Study
Effects of Reduced-exertion High-intensity Training Versus Short Moderate Intensity Training on Functional Capacity and Physical Activity Enjoyment in Sedentary Young Women A Randomized Trial
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Number of Sprint Repetitions in a Sprint Interval Training Session Does Not Moderate Improvements in V̇OScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Pooled it
- Sprint interval training for cardiovascular prevention: a time-efficient alternative or an overstated promise? An umbrella review.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Factors for adherence to a physical activity promotion program in the workplace: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of Interval Training in Improving Body Composition and Adiposity in Apparently Healthy Adults: An Umbrella Review with Meta-Analysis.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Pooled it
- Rates of compliance and adherence to high-intensity interval training: a systematic review and Meta-analyses.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023Pooled it
- Short High-Intensity Interval Exercise for Workplace-Based Physical Activity Interventions: A Systematic Review on Feasibility and Effectiveness.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Pooled it
- Affecting Effects on Affect: The Impact of Protocol Permutations on Affective Responses to Sprint Interval Exercise; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Pooled it
- Affective and Enjoyment Responses to Sprint Interval Training in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Pooled it
- Six Weeks of Low-Volume Sprint Interval Training Improves Peak Oxygen Uptake Compared to a Non-Exercise Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2025Trial
- Effect of exercise on sleep and cardiopulmonary parameters in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2021Trial
- Low-volume high-intensity interval training improves cardiometabolic health, work ability and well-being in severely obese individuals: a randomized-controlled trial sub-study.Journal of translational medicine · 2020Trial
- Article
- Cardiorespiratory and vascular function outcomes following 4 weeks of single-sprint training.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of reduced exertion high intensity interval training to modify cardiovascular disease-related risk factors-a narrative review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
- Effects of repeated sprint exercise on brachial artery shear rate patterns in healthy adults.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- "I just had the feeling that the interval training is more beneficial": young adults' subjective experiences of physical fitness and the role of training modes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Interfaces of occupational health management and corporate social responsibility: a multi-centre qualitative study from Germany.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Brief Exercise at Work (BE@Work): A Mixed-Methods Pilot Trial of a Workplace High-Intensity Interval Training Intervention.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Article
- Process Evaluation of Project FFAB (Fun Fast Activity Blasts): A Multi-Activity School-Based High-Intensity Interval Training Intervention.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Article
- Reduced-Exertion High-Intensity Interval Training as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Insomnia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy of high-intensity interval training (HIT) as a time-efficient exercise strategy for beneficially modifying risk factors for cardiovascular disease has repeatedly been demonstrated in controlled laboratory settings. However, the effectiveness of HIT in an unsupervised workplace setting has not been investigated. The objective of this study was to use mixed methods to investigate the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a short-duration, high-intensity exercise intervention (REHIT) when applied unsupervised in a workplace setting.
methodsTwenty-five office-workers (mean ± SD age: 47 ± 9 y, BMI: 27.5 ± 4.4 kg·m
resultsV̇O
conclusionsREHIT could be implemented as a feasible, effective and acceptable exercise intervention in a workplace setting, with a total time-commitment of < 20 min/week. Consideration of certain psycho-social factors and behaviour-change techniques may ensure adherence to the REHIT programme in the long term.
trial registrationThe study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 07/05/2019 (registration: NCT03941145).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.