Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32164631›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2020

Time-efficient and computer-guided sprint interval exercise training for improving health in the workplace: a randomised mixed-methods feasibility study in office-based employees.

Richard S Metcalfe, Hady Atef, Kelly Mackintosh, Melitta McNarry, Gemma Ryde, Denise M Hill, Niels B J Vollaard

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03941145 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of a Novel Workplace-based Exercise Intervention: a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of StirlingRan2019 to 2019Enrolled23ConditionsHealth BehaviorArmsReduced-Exertion High-Intensity Interval Training (REHIT)
NCT05875051 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Reduced-exertion High-intensity Training Versus Short Moderate Intensity Training on Functional Capacity and Physical Activity Enjoyment in Sedentary Young Women A Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ValenciaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsSedentary BehaviorArmsReduced-exertion high intensity training, Short moderate intensity training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Rates of compliance and adherence to high-intensity interval training: a systematic review and Meta-analyses.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Richard S MetcalfeApplied Sports Science, Technology, Exercise and Medicine Research Centre (A-STEM), Swansea University, Swansea, SA1 8EN, UK.
Hady AtefDepartment of Physical Therapy for Internal Medicine, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Kelly MackintoshApplied Sports Science, Technology, Exercise and Medicine Research Centre (A-STEM), Swansea University, Swansea, SA1 8EN, UK.
Melitta McNarryApplied Sports Science, Technology, Exercise and Medicine Research Centre (A-STEM), Swansea University, Swansea, SA1 8EN, UK.
Gemma RydeFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Denise M HillApplied Sports Science, Technology, Exercise and Medicine Research Centre (A-STEM), Swansea University, Swansea, SA1 8EN, UK.
Niels B J VollaardFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. n.vollaard@stir.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4576-8879

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of high-intensity interval training (HIT) as a time-efficient exercise strategy for beneficially modifying risk factors for cardiovascular disease has repeatedly been demonstrated in controlled laboratory settings. However, the effectiveness of HIT in an unsupervised workplace setting has not been investigated. The objective of this study was to use mixed methods to investigate the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a short-duration, high-intensity exercise intervention (REHIT) when applied unsupervised in a workplace setting.

methodsTwenty-five office-workers (mean ± SD age: 47 ± 9 y, BMI: 27.5 ± 4.4 kg·m

resultsV̇O

conclusionsREHIT could be implemented as a feasible, effective and acceptable exercise intervention in a workplace setting, with a total time-commitment of < 20 min/week. Consideration of certain psycho-social factors and behaviour-change techniques may ensure adherence to the REHIT programme in the long term.

trial registrationThe study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 07/05/2019 (registration: NCT03941145).

Indexed as

Occupational HealthAdultCardiovascular DiseasesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsTime FactorsAcceptabilityCardiorespiratory fitnessEffectivenessExerciseFeasibilityHigh-intensity interval trainingWorkplace health

Identifiers

PMID32164631
PMCPMC7068982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.