Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32164630›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Adverse event reports in patients taking psychiatric medication during pregnancy from spontaneous reports in Japan and the United States: an approach using latent class analysis.

Tatsuhiko Anzai, Kunihiko Takahashi, Michiko Watanabe, Mayumi Mochizuki, Atsuko Murashima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tatsuhiko AnzaiKeio University Graduate School of Health Management, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, 252-0883, Japan. tanzai04@keio.jp.
Kunihiko TakahashiDepartment of Biostatistics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Michiko WatanabeKeio University Graduate School of Health Management, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, 252-0883, Japan.
Mayumi MochizukiKeio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30 Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Atsuko MurashimaJapan Drug Information Institute in Pregnancy (J-TIS), National Center for Child Health and Development, 1-5-30 Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Keio University Shonan Fujisawa · JPKeio University · JPNagoya University · JPNational Center For Child Health and Development · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP18mk0101086.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known regarding the association between adverse events (AEs) and psychiatric medications administered to pregnant women in clinical trials during the pre-marketing period. This study analyzes reports of AE association with psychiatric medication administrated during pregnancy using post-marketing spontaneous reports of AE from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database and Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System in the United States (FAERS-US).

methodsWe summarized AE reports of psychiatric medication administrated during pregnancy by comparing data obtained from JADER and FAERS-US databases with medication patterns determined as classes via latent class analysis. The odds ratios (ORs) of AE reports categorized into system organ classes in which each class was compared with those without psychiatric medications.

resultsThe proportions of AE reports under psychiatric medication in pregnancy among all AE reports were 22.0% and 16.6% in JADER and FAERS-US, respectively. The 10,389 reports of psychiatric medication during pregnancy were classified into 11 classes. The proportion of patients receiving four or more psychiatric drugs in JADER was larger than that in FAERS-US. The maximum number of reports in combinations of AE and medication pattern in JADER was 169, for 'general disorders and administration site conditions' from the class of four or more medications (OR = 9.1), while that in FAERS-US was 1,654, for 'injury, poisoning, and procedural complications' from the class of single psychiatric medication (OR = 2.8).

conclusionsThe main AE reports and associated AE differed depending on medication patterns in pregnant women taking psychiatric medication. This study may provide a prediction of AEs that are likely to be reported with each medication pattern. Our findings of the association between AE reports and medication patterns could help improve the administration of psychiatric medications during pregnancy, though further research on additional datasets is needed to clarify these results.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsLatent Class AnalysisAdolescentAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsFemaleHumansJapanMental DisordersMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationYoung Adultadverse eventslatent class analysispolypharmacypregnancypsychiatric medicationspontaneous reports

Identifiers

PMID32164630
PMCPMC7068895
OpenAlexW3010659792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.