ReviewBMC infectious diseases2020
Diagnosing congenital Cytomegalovirus infection: don't get rid of dried blood spots.
Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Congenital cytomegalovirus screening by dried blood spot: a systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection Burden and Epidemiologic Risk Factors in Countries With Universal Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- From Suspected Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection to Malan Syndrome: Delayed Genetic Diagnosis Due to Diagnostic Anchoring.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Targeted congenital cytomegalovirus screening as part of the newborn hearing screening programme in Northeast England.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of Congenital Cytomegalovirus in a 14-Month-Old Patient Presenting with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Storing Dry Blood Samples.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Timing of congenital cytomegalovirus diagnosis and missed opportunities.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
- Unusual cerebral intraventricular hemorrhage and cardiomyopathy related to congenital cytomegalovirus from non-primary maternal infection: a case report.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for screening congenital cytomegalovirus infection in newborns.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Congenital Cytomegalovirus and Hearing Loss: The State of the Art.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Comparison of Overall Sensitivity and Specificity across Different Newborn Screening Algorithms for Congenital Cytomegalovirus.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Article
- Healthcare costs of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) disease in infants during the first two years of life: a retrospective German claims database analysis.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2023Article
- Pregnancy and viral infections: Mechanisms of fetal damage, diagnosis and prevention of neonatal adverse outcomes from cytomegalovirus to SARS-CoV-2 and Zika virus.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2021Review
- Comprehensive medical evaluation of pediatric bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2021Review
- Congenital Human Cytomegalovirus Infection Inducing Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment.Microorganisms · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital Cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is a serious global public health issue that can cause irreversible fetal and neonatal congenital defects in symptomatic or asymptomatic newborns at birth. In absence of universal cCMV screening, the retrospective diagnosis of cCMV infection in children is only possible by examining Dried Blood Spot (DBS) samples routinely collected at birth and stored for different time spans depending on the newborn screening regulations in force in different countries. In this article, we summarize the arguments in favor of long-term DBS sample storage for detecting cCMV infection. MAIN TEXT: CMV infection is the most common cause of congenital infection resulting in severe defects and anomalies that can be apparent at birth or develop in early childhood. Sensorineural hearing loss is the most frequent consequence of cCMV infection and may have a late onset and progress in the first years of life. The virological diagnosis of cCMV is essential for clinical research and public health practices. In fact, in order to assess the natural history of CMV infection and distinguish between congenital or acquired infection, children should be diagnosed early by analyzing biological samples collected in the first weeks of life (3 weeks by using viral culture and 2 weeks by molecular assays), which, unfortunately, are not always available for asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic children. It now seems possible to overcome this problem since the CMV-DNA present in the blood of congenitally infected newborns can be easily retrieved from the DBS samples on the Guthrie cards routinely collected and stored within 3 days from birth in the neonatal screening program for genetic and congenital diseases. Early collection and long-term storage are inexpensive methods for long-term bio-banking and are the key points of DBS testing for the detection of cCMV.
conclusionDBS sampling is a reliable and inexpensive method for long-term bio-banking, which enables to diagnose known infectious diseases - including cCMV - as well as diseases not jet recognized, therefore their storage sites and long-term storage conditions and durations should be the subject of political decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.