Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32164598›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Factors associated with short birth interval in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Juan Pimentel, Umaira Ansari, Khalid Omer, Yagana Gidado, Muhd Chadi Baba, Neil Andersson, Anne Cockcroft

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06307353 (Trends of Contraception Methods in Urban Medical Center in El_Balyana), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06307353 completednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Trends of Contraception Methods in Urban Medical Center in El_Balyana

TypeobservationalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled385ConditionsContraceptionArmstrends of contraception methods
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan PimentelCIET/PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges 3rd Floor, Suite 300, Montreal, Quebec, H3S 1Z1, Canada. juan.pimentel@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6842-3064
Umaira AnsariCentro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales (CIET), Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Calle Pino s/n Colonia El Roble, 39640, Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico.
Khalid OmerCentro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales (CIET), Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Calle Pino s/n Colonia El Roble, 39640, Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico.
Yagana GidadoFederation of Muslim Women Association of Nigeria (FOMWAN), Bauchi, Nigeria.
Muhd Chadi BabaFederation of Muslim Women Association of Nigeria (FOMWAN), Bauchi, Nigeria.
Neil AnderssonCIET/PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges 3rd Floor, Suite 300, Montreal, Quebec, H3S 1Z1, Canada.
Anne CockcroftCIET/PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges 3rd Floor, Suite 300, Montreal, Quebec, H3S 1Z1, Canada.

Funding

Innovating for Maternal and Child Health in Africa 108551-001/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is ample evidence of associations between short birth interval and adverse maternal and child health outcomes, including infant and maternal mortality. Short birth interval is more common among women in low- and middle-income countries. Identifying actionable aspects of short birth interval is necessary to address the problem. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to systematize evidence on risk factors for short birth interval in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsA systematic mixed studies review searched PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and Popline databases for empirical studies on the topic. We included documents in English, Spanish, French, Italian, and Portuguese, without date restriction. Two independent reviewers screened the articles and extracted the data. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to conduct a quality appraisal of the included studies. To accommodate variable definition of factors and outcomes, we present only a narrative synthesis of the findings.

resultsForty-three of an initial 2802 documents met inclusion criteria, 30 of them observational studies and 14 published after 2010. Twenty-one studies came from Africa, 18 from Asia, and four from Latin America. Thirty-two reported quantitative studies (16 studies reported odds ratio or relative risk, 16 studies reported hazard ratio), 10 qualitative studies, and one a mixed-methods study. Studies most commonly explored education and age of the mother, previous pregnancy outcome, breastfeeding, contraception, socioeconomic level, parity, and sex of the preceding child. For most factors, studies reported both positive and negative associations with short birth interval. Shorter breastfeeding and female sex of the previous child were the only factors consistently associated with short birth interval. The quantitative and qualitative studies reported largely non-overlapping results.

conclusionsPromotion of breastfeeding could help to reduce short birth interval and has many other benefits. Addressing the preference for a male child is complex and a longer-term challenge. Future quantitative research could examine associations between birth interval and factors reported in qualitative studies, use longitudinal and experimental designs, ensure consistency in outcome and exposure definitions, and include Latin American countries.

trial registrationProspectively registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews) under registration number CRD42018117654.

Indexed as

Birth IntervalsBreast FeedingDeveloping CountriesContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSex FactorsBirth intervalsBreastfeedingDeveloping countriesPregnancy outcomeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32164598
PMCPMC7069040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.