Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32164547›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Applications of machine learning for simulations of red blood cells in microfluidic devices.

Hynek Bachratý, Katarína Bachratá, Michal Chovanec, Iveta Jančigová, Monika Smiešková, Kristína Kovalčíková

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hynek BachratýDepartment of Software Technologies, Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of žilina, Cell-in-fluid Research Group, žilina, Slovakia.
Katarína BachratáDepartment of Software Technologies, Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of žilina, Cell-in-fluid Research Group, žilina, Slovakia.
Michal ChovanecDepartment of Technical Cybernetics, Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of žilina, žilina, Slovakia.
Iveta JančigováDepartment of Software Technologies, Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of žilina, Cell-in-fluid Research Group, žilina, Slovakia.
Monika SmieškováDepartment of Software Technologies, Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of žilina, Cell-in-fluid Research Group, žilina, Slovakia.
Kristína KovalčíkováDepartment of Software Technologies, Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of žilina, Cell-in-fluid Research Group, žilina, Slovakia.
University of Žilina · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor optimization of microfluidic devices for the analysis of blood samples, it is useful to simulate blood cells as elastic objects in flow of blood plasma. In such numerical models, we primarily need to take into consideration the movement and behavior of the dominant component of the blood, the red blood cells. This can be done quite precisely in small channels and within a short timeframe. However, larger volumes or timescales require different approaches. Instead of simplifying the simulation, we use a neural network to predict the movement of the red blood cells.

resultsThe neural network uses data from the numerical simulation for learning, however, the simulation needs only be run once. Alternatively, the data could come from video processing of a recording of a biological experiment. Afterwards, the network is able to predict the movement of the red blood cells because it is a system of bases that gives an approximate cell velocity at each point of the simulation channel as a linear combination of bases.In a simple box geometry, the neural network gives results comparable to predictions using fluid streamlines, however in a channel with obstacles forming slits, the neural network is about five times more accurate.The network can also be used as a discriminator between different situations. We observe about two-fold increase in mean relative error when a network trained on one geometry is used to predict trajectories in a modified geometry. Even larger increase was observed when it was used to predict trajectories of cells with different elastic properties.

conclusionsWhile for uncomplicated box channels there is no advantage in using a system of bases instead of a simple prediction using fluid streamlines, in a more complicated geometry, the neural network is significantly more accurate. Another application of this system of bases is using it as a comparison tool for different modeled situations. This has a significant future potential when applied to processing data from videos of microfluidic flows.

Indexed as

Machine LearningBiomechanical PhenomenaBlood CirculationErythrocytesHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMembrane FluidityMicrofluidicsCell trajectoriesMicrofluidic deviceNeural networkRed blood cellSimulation of fluid

Identifiers

PMID32164547
PMCPMC7068868
OpenAlexW3011057242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.