ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020
A retrospective analysis of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections at a Scottish tertiary hospital.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vitro Antibacterial Effect of Probiotics Against Bacterial Isolates from Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Ain Shams University Hospitals.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Seasonality of Bacterial Strains in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Implications for Empiric Antibiotic Therapy in a Temperate Region with Distinct Seasons.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- The Impact of the Skin Microbiome and Oxidative Stress on the Initiation and Development of Cutaneous Chronic Wounds.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Microbiology of Diabetic Foot Infections in U.S. Veterans.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
- An Update on Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Its Management Modalities.Indian journal of microbiology · 2024Review
- Modulations of the skin microbiome in skin disorders: A narrative review from a wound care perspective.International wound journal · 2024Review
- The Microbial Diversity and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile Underlying Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Retrospective Study Conducted in North Queensland, Australia.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Article
- Dual Drug-Loaded Coaxial Nanofiber Dressings for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
- Distribution of Causative Microorganisms in Diabetic Foot Infections: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Malaysia.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Transcriptomic identification of genes expressed in invasiveFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Microbial Profile and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern in Diabetic Patients with Mild, Moderate, and Severe Foot Infections in Tehran.Archives of Razi Institute · 2022Article
- Bacterial profile of diabetic foot infections and antibiotic susceptibility in a specialized diabetes centre in Cameroon.The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- Article
- Bacterial diversity and inflammatory response at first-time visit in younger and older individuals with diabetic foot infection (DFI).Acta diabetologica · 2021Article
- Extended SpectrumInternational journal of microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study represents the first Scottish retrospective analysis of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections (DFIs). The aims were to compare the microbiological profile of DFIs treated at a Scottish tertiary hospital to that in the literature, gather data regarding antimicrobial resistance and investigate potential trends between the microbiological results and nature or site of the clinical sample taken and age or gender of the patients.
methodsA retrospective analysis of wound microbiology results was performed, data were obtained from one multidisciplinary outpatient foot clinic during the 12 months of the year 2017. Seventy-three patients and 200 microbiological investigations were included. In cases of soft tissue infection, the deepest part of a cleansed and debrided wound was sampled. In cases of osteomyelitis a bone biopsy was obtained. Factors influencing the pattern of microbial growth or prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus were investigated.
resultsOf the 200 microbiological investigations, 62% were culture positive, of which 37.9% were polymicrobial and 62.1% monomicrobial. Among the monomicrobial results (n = 77), most were Gram positive isolates (96.1%) and the most frequently isolated bacteria was S. aureus (84.4%). No methicillin-resistant S. aureus was reported. The prevalence of S. aureus in DFIs was associated with increasing age (p = 0.021), but no evidence of association with gender, anatomical sample site or sample material was found.
conclusionThe microbiological profile of DFIs in Scotland resembles that reported elsewhere in the UK. In this context, Gram positive organisms, primarily S. aureus, are most frequently isolated from DFIs. The S. aureus isolates identified were largely susceptible to antibiotic therapy. An association between increasing patient age and the prevalence of S. aureus in DFIs was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.