Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32164543›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

A retrospective analysis of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections at a Scottish tertiary hospital.

Katherine E Macdonald, Crispin Y Jordan, Emma Crichton, Judith E Barnes, Gillian E Harkin, Lesley M L Hall, Joshua D Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Microbiology of Diabetic Foot Infections in U.S. Veterans.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transcriptomic identification of genes expressed in invasiveFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Extended SpectrumInternational journal of microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine E MacdonaldEdinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, Infection Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Crispin Y JordanBiomedical Teaching Organisation, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 3, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Emma CrichtonDiabetes and Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Govan, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Judith E BarnesDiabetes and Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Govan, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Gillian E HarkinDiabetes and Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Govan, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Lesley M L HallDiabetes and Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Govan, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Joshua D JonesEdinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences, Infection Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK. josh.jones@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0981-1913
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBZhejiang University-University of Edinburgh Institute · CN

Funding

Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland Vacation scholarshipMedical Research Council MC_PC_18046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study represents the first Scottish retrospective analysis of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections (DFIs). The aims were to compare the microbiological profile of DFIs treated at a Scottish tertiary hospital to that in the literature, gather data regarding antimicrobial resistance and investigate potential trends between the microbiological results and nature or site of the clinical sample taken and age or gender of the patients.

methodsA retrospective analysis of wound microbiology results was performed, data were obtained from one multidisciplinary outpatient foot clinic during the 12 months of the year 2017. Seventy-three patients and 200 microbiological investigations were included. In cases of soft tissue infection, the deepest part of a cleansed and debrided wound was sampled. In cases of osteomyelitis a bone biopsy was obtained. Factors influencing the pattern of microbial growth or prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus were investigated.

resultsOf the 200 microbiological investigations, 62% were culture positive, of which 37.9% were polymicrobial and 62.1% monomicrobial. Among the monomicrobial results (n = 77), most were Gram positive isolates (96.1%) and the most frequently isolated bacteria was S. aureus (84.4%). No methicillin-resistant S. aureus was reported. The prevalence of S. aureus in DFIs was associated with increasing age (p = 0.021), but no evidence of association with gender, anatomical sample site or sample material was found.

conclusionThe microbiological profile of DFIs in Scotland resembles that reported elsewhere in the UK. In this context, Gram positive organisms, primarily S. aureus, are most frequently isolated from DFIs. The S. aureus isolates identified were largely susceptible to antibiotic therapy. An association between increasing patient age and the prevalence of S. aureus in DFIs was observed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsDebridementDiabetic FootFemaleHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedOsteomyelitisRetrospective StudiesScotlandSoft Tissue InfectionsStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiabetic foot infectionMicrobiologyRetrospectiveStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID32164543
PMCPMC7068857
OpenAlexW3010978512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.