ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020
Diagnostic accuracy and utility of three dengue diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of acute dengue infection in Malaysia.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Different Domains of Dengue Research in Malaysia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Questionnaire-Based Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Accuracy and Usability of a New Rapid Diagnostic Test for the Diagnosis of Dengue in Vientiane, Laos.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Molecular Detection Algorithms for Enhanced Dengue Surveillance: A Field Case Evaluation.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2026Article
- Evaluating a pathogen-specific IgG binding assay for rapid detection of healthcare-associated infections.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Utilizing rapid diagnostic tests in infectious disease surveillance and response in humanitarian emergencies.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Dominance of DENV-1 and Flavivirus Serological Cross-Reactivity During the 2016 Dengue Outbreak in Vietnam.Journal of medical virology · 2025Article
- Operational evaluation of the deployment of Malaria/CRP Duo and Dengue Duo rapid diagnostic tests for the management of febrile illness by village malaria workers in rural Cambodia.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Application of a Dengue NS1 antigen based rapid diagnostic test to screen dengue virus infection in clinical settings in Indonesia.Journal of public health research · 2025Article
- Assessing AedesTech mosquito home system on yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) in Northern Malaysia.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2025Article
- Kinetics of NS1 and anti-NS1 IgG following dengue infection reveals likely early formation of immune complexes in secondary infected patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of clinical and virological features in pediatric and adult dengue cases at Insein General Hospital during Myanmar's 2022 dengue season.Tropical medicine and health · 2025Article
- Clinical Performance of MAGLUMI Diagnostic Tests for the Automated Detection of Dengue Virus.Viruses · 2025Article
- Review
- The feasibility of novel point-of-care diagnostics for febrile illnesses at health centres in Southeast Asia: a mixed-methods study.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2023Article
- A nonstructural protein 1 capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay specific for dengue viruses.PloS one · 2023Article
- Reduction in Anti-Dengue Virus IgG Antibody Levels with the Use of a Larvicide for Vector Control in Rural Lao People's Democratic Republic.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Article
- Neurological Complications of Dengue Fever.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022Review
- Dengue and COVID-19: Managing Undifferentiated Febrile Illness during a "Twindemic".Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Article
- Combining rapid diagnostic tests to estimate primary and post-primary dengue immune status at the point of care.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- A high-throughput real-time PCR tissue-of-origin test to distinguish blood from lymphoblastoid cell line DNA for (epi)genomic studies.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDengue is an emerging infectious disease that infects up to 390 million people yearly. The growing demand of dengue diagnostics especially in low-resource settings gave rise to many rapid diagnostic tests (RDT). This study evaluated the accuracy and utility of ViroTrack Dengue Acute - a new biosensors-based dengue NS1 RDT, SD Bioline Dengue Duo NS1/IgM/IgG combo - a commercially available RDT, and SD Dengue NS1 Ag enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), for the diagnosis of acute dengue infection.
methodsThis prospective cross-sectional study consecutively recruited 494 patients with suspected dengue from a health clinic in Malaysia. Both RDTs were performed onsite. The evaluated ELISA and reference tests were performed in a virology laboratory. The reference tests comprised of a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and three ELISAs for the detection of dengue NS1 antigen, IgM and IgG antibodies, respectively. The diagnostic performance of evaluated tests was computed using STATA version 12.
resultsThe sensitivity and specificity of ViroTrack were 62.3% (95%CI 55.6-68.7) and 95.0% (95%CI 91.7-97.3), versus 66.5% (95%CI 60.0-72.6) and 95.4% (95%CI 92.1-97.6) for SD NS1 ELISA, and 52.4% (95%CI 45.7-59.1) and 97.7% (95%CI 95.1-99.2) for NS1 component of SD Bioline, respectively. The combination of the latter with its IgM and IgG components were able to increase test sensitivity to 82.4% (95%CI 76.8-87.1) with corresponding decrease in specificity to 87.4% (95%CI 82.8-91.2). Although a positive test on any of the NS1 assays would increase the probability of dengue to above 90% in a patient, a negative result would only reduce this probability to 23.0-29.3%. In contrast, this probability of false negative diagnosis would be further reduced to 14.7% (95%CI 11.4-18.6) if SD Bioline NS1/IgM/IgG combo was negative.
conclusionsThe performance of ViroTrack Dengue Acute was comparable to SD Dengue NS1 Ag ELISA. Addition of serology components to SD Bioline Dengue Duo significantly improved its sensitivity and reduced its false negative rate such that it missed the fewest dengue patients, making it a better point-of-care diagnostic tool. New RDT like ViroTrack Dengue Acute may be a potential alternative to existing RDT if its combination with serology components is proven better in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.