Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32163820›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2020

Transgender stigma: A critical scoping review of definitions, domains, and measures used in empirical research.

Wesley M King, Jaclyn M W Hughto, Don Operario

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The lived experience of trans persons: a bottom-up review co-written by experts by experience and academics.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wesley M KingUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: wesking@umich.edu.
Jaclyn M W HughtoBrown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA. Electronic address: jaclyn_hughto@brown.edu.
Don OperarioBrown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA. Electronic address: don_operario@brown.edu.

Funding

Project 4: Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS): Fetus to First YearsP20GM125507 · NIGMS · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI Brandon David Lewis Marshall · 2018 to 2026
$23.4M
Minority Populations Resource CoreU24AA022000 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI OPERARIO, DON · 2012 to 2015
$1.9M
NIAAA NIH HHS U24 AA022000NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM125507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleA growing body of transgender (trans) health research has explored the relationship between stigma and health; yet, studies have conceptualized and operationalized anti-trans stigma in multiple ways.

objectiveThis scoping review aims to critically analyze quantitative measures of anti-trans stigma in the U.S. using a socioecological framework.

methodWe organized and appraised measures from 126 included articles according to socioecological level: structural, interpersonal, or individual.

resultsOf the identified articles, 36 measured anti-trans stigma at the structural level (i.e., institutional structures and policies), 102 measured anti-trans at the interpersonal level (i.e., community interactions), and 44 measured anti-trans stigma at the individual level (i.e., internalized or anticipated stigma). Definitions of anti-trans stigma varied substantially across articles. Most measures were adapted from measures developed for other populations (i.e., sexual minorities) and were not previously validated for trans samples.

conclusionsStudies analyzing anti-trans stigma should concretely define anti-trans stigma. There is a need to develop measures of anti-trans stigma at all socioecological levels informed by the lived experiences of trans people.

Indexed as

MeasurementStigmaTransgenderUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32163820
PMCPMC7442603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.