Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32163613›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2020

Modeling-Based Bone Formation in the Human Femoral Neck in Subjects Treated With Denosumab.

David W Dempster, Arkadi Chines, Mathias P Bostrom, Jeri W Nieves, Hua Zhou, Li Chen, Nico Pannacciulli, Rachel B Wagman, Felicia Cosman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Long-term effect of denosumab on bone microarchitecture as assessed by tissue thickness-adjusted trabecular bone score in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from FREEDOM and its open-label extension.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The cellular effect of intermittent PTH treatment on bone remodeling and modeling in humans-a histomorphometry centered scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Denosumab Discontinuation.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Updated trabecular bone score accounting for the soft tissue thickness (TBSOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  16. Anabolic therapy for osteoporosis: update on efficacy and safety.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David W DempsterColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2262-4039
Arkadi ChinesAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Mathias P BostromHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Jeri W NievesColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8593-343X
Hua ZhouHelen Hayes Hospital, West Haverstraw, NY, USA.
Li ChenAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Nico PannacciulliAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Rachel B WagmanAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Felicia CosmanColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4554-6616
Amgen (United States) · USHelen Hayes Hospital · USColumbia University · USHospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denosumab is associated with continued gains in hip and spine BMD with up to 10 years of treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Despite potent inhibition of bone remodeling, findings in nonhuman primates suggest modeling-based bone formation (MBBF) may persist during denosumab treatment. This study assessed whether MBBF in the femoral neck (FN) is preserved in the context of inhibited remodeling in subjects receiving denosumab. This open-label study enrolled postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who had received two or more doses of denosumab (60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months [Q6M]) per standard of care and were planning elective total hip replacement (THR) owing to osteoarthritis of the hip. Transverse sections of the FN were obtained after THR and analyzed histomorphometrically. MBBF, based on fluorochrome labeling and presence of smooth cement lines, was evaluated in cancellous, endocortical, and periosteal envelopes of the FN. Histomorphometric parameters were used to assess MBBF and remodeling-based bone formation (RBBF) in denosumab-treated subjects (n = 4; mean age = 73.5 years; range, 70 to 78 years) and historical female controls (n = 11; mean age = 67.8 years; range, 62 to 80 years) obtained from the placebo group of a prior study and not treated with denosumab. All analyses were descriptive. All subjects in both groups exhibited MBBF in the periosteal envelope; in cancellous and endocortical envelopes, all denosumab-treated subjects and 81.8% of controls showed evidence of MBBF. Compared with controls, denosumab-treated subjects showed 9.4-fold and 2.0-fold higher mean values of MBBF in cancellous and endocortical envelopes, respectively, whereas RBBF mean values were 5.0-fold and 5.3-fold lower. In the periosteal envelope, MBBF and RBBF rates were similar between subjects and controls. These results demonstrate the occurrence of MBBF in the human FN and suggest that denosumab preserves MBBF while inhibiting remodeling, which may contribute to the observed continued gains in BMD over time after remodeling is maximally inhibited. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabFemur NeckOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalBone DensityBone RemodelingFemaleHumansOsteogenesisBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabANTIRESORPTIVESBONE HISTOMORPHOMETRYBONE MODELING AND REMODELINGOSTEOPOROSIS

Identifiers

PMID32163613
PMCPMC9328280
OpenAlexW3012485455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.