Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32163442›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Difference contact maps: From what to why in the analysis of the conformational flexibility of proteins.

Mallika Iyer, Zhanwen Li, Lukasz Jaroszewski, Mayya Sedova, Adam Godzik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mallika IyerGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Zhanwen LiBiosciences Division, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, United States of America.
Lukasz JaroszewskiBiosciences Division, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, United States of America.
Mayya SedovaBiosciences Division, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, United States of America.
Adam GodzikBiosciences Division, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2425-852X

Funding

Understanding structural flexibility and evolutionary divergence of proteinsR35GM118187 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI GODZIK, ADAM · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein structures, usually visualized in various highly idealized forms focusing on the three-dimensional arrangements of secondary structure elements, can also be described as lists of interacting residues or atoms and visualized as two-dimensional distance or contact maps. We show that contact maps provide an ideal tool to describe and analyze differences between structures of proteins in different conformations. Expanding functionality of the PDBFlex server and database developed previously in our group, we describe how analysis of difference contact maps (DCMs) can be used to identify critical interactions stabilizing alternative protein conformations, recognize residues and positions controlling protein functions and build hypotheses as to molecular mechanisms of disease mutations.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein Structure, SecondaryAlgorithmsBinding SitesComputational BiologyLigandsProtein BindingProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID32163442
PMCPMC7067477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.