Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32163421›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Intergenerational transmission of child maltreatment using a multi-informant multi-generation family design.

Renate S M Buisman, Katharina Pittner, Marieke S Tollenaar, Jolanda Lindenberg, Lisa J M van den Berg, Laura H C G Compier-de Block, Joost R van Ginkel, Lenneke R A Alink, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Bernet M Elzinga and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Is there intergenerational continuity in early life experiences? Findings from the Harvard Study of Adult Development.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Renate S M BuismanCentre for Forensic Family and Youth Care Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0394-1418
Katharina PittnerCentre for Forensic Family and Youth Care Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marieke S TollenaarLeiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jolanda LindenbergLeyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lisa J M van den BergLeiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Laura H C G Compier-de BlockCentre for Forensic Family and Youth Care Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joost R van GinkelMethodology and Statistics, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lenneke R A AlinkCentre for Forensic Family and Youth Care Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marian J Bakermans-KranenburgLeiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Bernet M ElzingaLeiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Marinus H van IJzendoornPrimary Care Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current study a three-generational design was used to investigate intergenerational transmission of child maltreatment (ITCM) using multiple sources of information on child maltreatment: mothers, fathers and children. A total of 395 individuals from 63 families reported on maltreatment. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to combine data from mother, father and child about maltreatment that the child had experienced. This established components reflecting the convergent as well as the unique reports of father, mother and child on the occurrence of maltreatment. Next, we tested ITCM using the multi-informant approach and compared the results to those of two more common approaches: ITCM based on one reporter and ITCM based on different reporters from each generation. Results of our multi-informant approach showed that a component reflecting convergence between mother, father, and child reports explained most of the variance in experienced maltreatment. For abuse, intergenerational transmission was consistently found across approaches. In contrast, intergenerational transmission of neglect was only found using the perspective of a single reporter, indicating that transmission of neglect might be driven by reporter effects. In conclusion, the present results suggest that including multiple informants may be necessary to obtain more valid estimates of ITCM.

Indexed as

Adult Survivors of Child AbuseChild AbuseFathersIntergenerational RelationsMother-Child RelationsMothersAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID32163421
PMCPMC7067458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.