ReviewMolekuliarnaia biologiia
[Combination of Oncolytic Virotherapy and CAR T/NK Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Cancer].
Review in Molekuliarnaia biologiia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation CAR-NK cell therapy: engineering strategies, translational challenges, and future perspectives in cancer immunotherapy.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Progress in the research and development of oncolytic virus therapies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Emerging combined CAR-NK cell therapies in cancer treatment: Finding a dancing partner.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Engineered immune cell therapies for solid tumors: pharmacological advances, clinical outcomes, and future directions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Review
- The investigation of oncolytic viruses in the field of cancer therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- CAR-macrophage: Breaking new ground in cellular immunotherapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- The CAR macrophage cells, a novel generation of chimeric antigen-based approach against solid tumors.Biomarker research · 2023Review
- The application of HER2 and CD47 CAR-macrophage in ovarian cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Biological causes of immunogenic cancer cell death (ICD) and anti-tumor therapy; Combination of Oncolytic virus-based immunotherapy and CAR T-cell therapy for ICD induction.Cancer cell international · 2022Review
- Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Engineered Natural Killer (CAR NK) Cells in Cancer Treatment; Recent Advances and Future Prospects.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2021Review
- Current Trends in Cancer Immunotherapy.Biomedicines · 2020Review
- Reporter Transgenes for Monitoring the Antitumor Efficacy of Recombinant Oncolytic Viruses.Acta naturaeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple lines of evidence indicate that CAR-T cell based therapy and oncolytic virotherapy display robust performance in both immunocompetent and immunodeficient mouse models. Rare, yet highly successful attempts to combine these therapeutic platforms have also been reported. Interestingly, both approaches have shown pronounced efficacy in human trials, albeit these were limited to just a handful of malignancies. Specifically, CD19-specific CAR-T cell products (Kymriah and Yescarta) have been highly effective against B cell lymphomas and leukemias, whereas administering oncolytic viruses resulted in pronounced responses in melanoma (Imlygic and Rigvir) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (Oncorine) patients. It is well established that efficacy of virotherapy as a standalone approach is largely restricted by the pre-existing and mounting immune response against viral antigens, and requires a relatively functional immune system, which is not typical for cancer patients, with the current antitumor therapy schemes. On the other hand, the most important challenges faced by the current CAR-T cell therapy formats include the lack of targetable tumor-specific surface antigens, tumor cell heterogeneity, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, not to mention the unacceptably high costs. Remarkably, combining the two approaches may help address their individual bottlenecks. Namely, local acute inflammatory reaction induced by the viral infection may reverse tumor-associated immunosuppression and lead to more efficient homing and penetration of CAR-expressing lymphocytes into the tumor stroma; combined viral and CAR-mediated cytotoxicity may ensure the production of immunogenic cell debris and efficient presentation of tumor neoantigens, and potently recruit the patient's own bystander immune cells to attack cancer cells. Thus, testing the combinations of CAR-based and virolytic approaches in the clinical setting appears both logical and highly promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32163385What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.