Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32163385›Full record

ReviewMolekuliarnaia biologiia

[Combination of Oncolytic Virotherapy and CAR T/NK Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Cancer].

G V Kochneva, G F Sivolobova, A V Tkacheva, A A Gorchakov, S V Kulemzin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molekuliarnaia biologiia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Emerging combined CAR-NK cell therapies in cancer treatment: Finding a dancing partner.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. CAR-macrophage: Breaking new ground in cellular immunotherapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G V KochnevaState Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology "Vector", Koltsovo, Novosibirsk oblast, 630559 Russia.
G F SivolobovaState Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology "Vector", Koltsovo, Novosibirsk oblast, 630559 Russia.
A V TkachevaState Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology "Vector", Koltsovo, Novosibirsk oblast, 630559 Russia.
A A GorchakovInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630090 Russia.
S V KulemzinInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630090 Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple lines of evidence indicate that CAR-T cell based therapy and oncolytic virotherapy display robust performance in both immunocompetent and immunodeficient mouse models. Rare, yet highly successful attempts to combine these therapeutic platforms have also been reported. Interestingly, both approaches have shown pronounced efficacy in human trials, albeit these were limited to just a handful of malignancies. Specifically, CD19-specific CAR-T cell products (Kymriah and Yescarta) have been highly effective against B cell lymphomas and leukemias, whereas administering oncolytic viruses resulted in pronounced responses in melanoma (Imlygic and Rigvir) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (Oncorine) patients. It is well established that efficacy of virotherapy as a standalone approach is largely restricted by the pre-existing and mounting immune response against viral antigens, and requires a relatively functional immune system, which is not typical for cancer patients, with the current antitumor therapy schemes. On the other hand, the most important challenges faced by the current CAR-T cell therapy formats include the lack of targetable tumor-specific surface antigens, tumor cell heterogeneity, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, not to mention the unacceptably high costs. Remarkably, combining the two approaches may help address their individual bottlenecks. Namely, local acute inflammatory reaction induced by the viral infection may reverse tumor-associated immunosuppression and lead to more efficient homing and penetration of CAR-expressing lymphocytes into the tumor stroma; combined viral and CAR-mediated cytotoxicity may ensure the production of immunogenic cell debris and efficient presentation of tumor neoantigens, and potently recruit the patient's own bystander immune cells to attack cancer cells. Thus, testing the combinations of CAR-based and virolytic approaches in the clinical setting appears both logical and highly promising.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveOncolytic VirotherapyAnimalsHumansKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsOncolytic VirusesReceptors, Chimeric AntigenTumor MicroenvironmentReceptors, Chimeric Antigenanticancer immunitycancer therapychimeric antigen receptorsNK-cellsoncolytic virusesT-cellsvirotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.