Trial reportJAMA oncology2020
Association of Germline Variant Status With Therapy Response in High-risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the GeparOcto Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02125344 (A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Two Dose-dense, Dose-intensified Approaches), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Two Dose-dense, Dose-intensified Approaches (ETC and PM(Cb)) for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Patients With High-risk Early Breast Cancer (GeparOcto)
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Characterization of the HER2 status in BRCA-mutated breast cancer: a single institutional series and systematic review with pooled analysis.ESMO open · 2022Pooled it
- Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials.Bioengineered · 2022Pooled it
- Effect and Safety of Therapeutic Regimens for Patients With Germline BRCA Mutation-Associated Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Genetic Alterations, Therapy Response, and Survival Among Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Clinical effectiveness and safety of olaparib in BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting: final analysis of LUCY.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Trial
- Adjuvant Olaparib for Patients withThe New England journal of medicine · 2021Trial
- Modulation of the response to immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: the role of the microbiota and microbial metabolites in the tumor microenvironment.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Clinicopathological features, immunophenotyping, and immunohistochemical biomarkers associated with germline BRCA1/2 variants in breast cancer: a retrospective cohort of 265 patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus chemo-immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients with and without germline BRCA mutations.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for prognostic prediction in young women with triple-negative invasive ductal breast cancer: a Boruta-SHAP integrated approach.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression in Patients With gBRCA-m Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Paclitaxel drives TREM2Nature communications · 2026Article
- Baseline Gut Microbiome and Metabolite Profiles Associate with Treatment Response in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Cost-effectiveness of fuzuloparib, with or without apatinib, for BRCA mutation HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive genomic profiling of breast cancer reveals mutational landscape and the PEEKABOO model: a population-specific assessment tool for predicting germline mutations.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Jab1 regulates HRR mRNA stability to modulate PARP inhibitor sensitivity in triple-negative breast cancer.Molecular cancer · 2025Article
- Impact of germline BRCA1/2 mutations on response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy and prognosis in breast cancer: a propensity score matched cohort study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The GeparOcto randomized clinical trial compared the efficacy of 2 neoadjuvant breast cancer (BC) treatment regimens: sequential intense dose-dense epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (iddEPC) vs weekly paclitaxel and nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PM) in patients with different biological BC subtypes. Patients with triple-negative BC (TNBC) randomized to the PM arm received additional carboplatin (PMCb). Overall, no difference in pathologic complete response (pCR) rates was observed between study arms. It remained elusive whether the germline variant status of BRCA1/2 and further BC predisposition genes are associated with treatment outcome. Objective: To determine treatment outcome for BC according to germline variant status. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective biomarker study is a secondary analysis of the GeparOcto multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial conducted between December 2014 and June 2016. Genetic analyses assessing for variants in BRCA1/2 and 16 other BC predisposition genes in 914 of 945 women were performed at the Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany, from August 2017 through December 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of patients who achieved pCR (ypT0/is ypN0 definition) after neoadjuvant treatment according to germline variant status. Results: In the study sample of 914 women with different BC subtypes with a mean (range) age at BC diagnosis of 48 (21-76) years, overall higher pCR rates were observed in patients with BRCA1/2 variants than in patients without (60.4% vs 46.7%; odds ratio [OR], 1.74; 95% CI, 1.13-2.68; P = .01); variants in non-BRCA1/2 BC predisposition genes were not associated with therapy response. Patients with TNBC with BRCA1/2 variants achieved highest pCR rates. In the TNBC subgroup, a positive BRCA1/2 variant status was associated with therapy response in both the PMCb arm (74.3% vs 47.0% without BRCA1/2 variant; OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.44-7.39; P = .005) and the iddEPC arm (64.7% vs 45.0%; OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.04-4.84; P = .04). A positive BRCA1/2 variant status was also associated with elevated pCR rates in patients with ERBB2-negative, hormone receptor-positive BC (31.8% vs 11.9%; OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.22-9.72; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: Effective chemotherapy for BRCA1/2-mutated TNBC is commonly suggested to be platinum based. With a pCR rate of 64.7%, iddEPC may also be effective in these patients, though further prospective studies are needed. The elevated pCR rate in BRCA1/2-mutated ERBB2-negative, hormone receptor-positive BC suggests that germline BRCA1/2 testing should be considered prior to treatment start. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02125344.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.