ArticleAJOB empirical bioethics
First Do No Harm: Ethical Concerns of Health Researchers That Discourage the Sharing of Results With Research Participants.
Article in AJOB empirical bioethics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current global practice and implications for future research on disseminating health research results to study participants: A systematic review.PLoS medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Reciprocity in research: Participant views on return of results in the WATCH-PD qualitative study.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Navigating Privacy in Facial Transplantation: Ethical Considerations and Institutional Strategies.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Article
- Ethical considerations for sharing aggregate results from pragmatic clinical trials.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2025Article
- Brief Report: Positive Caregiver Perceptions on Receiving Research Summary Reports in Autism Longitudinal Research.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024Article
- Return of aggregate results to study participants: Facilitators, barriers, and recommendations.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2023Article
- Rural Research Network to engage rural and minority community members in translational research.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2023Article
- Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Article
- Ethical Considerations in Clinical Trials for Disorders of Consciousness.Brain sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.