Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162819›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2020

Biliary Stone Disease in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated with Somatostatin Analogs: A Multicenter Study.

Nicole Brighi, Francesco Panzuto, Roberta Modica, Fabio Gelsomino, Manuela Albertelli, Sara Pusceddu, Sara Massironi, Giuseppe Lamberti, Maria Rinzivillo, Antongiulio Faggiano and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Surgical aspects of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole BrighiNET Team Bologna ENETS Center of Excellence, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco PanzutoDigestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy.
Roberta ModicaClinical Medicine and Surgery Department - Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Fabio GelsominoDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Manuela AlbertelliEndocrinology Department (DiMi), San Martino University Hospital, Genova, Italy.
Sara PuscedduDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Tumori Milano, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy.
Sara MassironiGastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe LambertiNET Team Bologna ENETS Center of Excellence, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Maria RinzivilloDigestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy.
Antongiulio FaggianoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Andrea SpallanzaniDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Diego FeroneEndocrinology Department (DiMi), San Martino University Hospital, Genova, Italy.
Natalie PrinziDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Tumori Milano, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy.
Roberta Elisa RossiGastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Bruno AnnibaleDigestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy.
Anna Maria ColaoClinical Medicine and Surgery Department - Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Davide CampanaNET Team Bologna ENETS Center of Excellence, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4615-7340
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSomatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the mainstay of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) treatment. Biliary stone disease is reported as a common side effect of SSAs, with a frequency ranging from 10% to 63%. Studies on SSA-treated patients for acromegaly report an increased incidence of biliary stone disease compared with the general population, whereas data on patients with NETs are few. Guidelines are based on weak evidence, thus resulting in conflicting recommendations. The aim of the study is to evaluate biliary stone disease incidence, complications, and risk factors in a large population of SSA-treated patients with NETs. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed. Patients with a diagnosis of NET in seven dedicated centers from 1995 to 2017 were included at the time of SSA start.

resultsA total of 754 SSA-treated patients were evaluated. Patients with history of cholecystectomy or with known biliary stone disease were excluded; 478 patients were included. Among them, 118 patients (24.7%) received prophylactic ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). During the study period, 129 patients (27.0%) developed biliary stone disease; of them, 36 (27.9%) developed biliary complications. On multivariate analysis, primary gastrointestinal (GI)-NET (hazard ratio [HR] 1.76) and related surgery (HR 1.58) were independent risk factors for biliary stone disease.

conclusionWe report a high incidence of biliary stone disease particularly in GI-NET or GI surgery. UDCA prophylaxis does not seem to have a protective role. Our data suggest that all patients with primary GI-NET or undergoing abdominal surgery should be considered for prophylactic cholecystectomy; no conclusion could be drawn on the indication of prophylactic cholecystectomy in patients with primary pancreatic or thoracic NET for whom abdominal surgery is not planned. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of this study confirm an increased rate of gallstones development and related complications in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). NETs of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and related surgery are independent risk factors for biliary stone disease development. Therefore, all patients with primary GI-NET or undergoing abdominal surgery should be considered for prophylactic cholecystectomy. Data on other subgroups are not exhaustive, and management also evaluating additional clinical features (life expectancy, surgical and anesthesiological risks) should be considered. Prophylactic treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid does not seem to be a protective factor for SSA-related biliary stone disease.

Indexed as

Intestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective StudiesSomatostatinSomatostatinAdverse eventsGallstonesNeuroendocrine neoplasmsProphylactic cholecystectomyUrsodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

PMID32162819
PMCPMC7066710
OpenAlexW2986100545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.