Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162818›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2020

Access to Novel Drugs for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Central and Southeastern Europe: A Central European Cooperative Oncology Group Analysis.

Tanja Cufer, Tudor E Ciuleanu, Peter Berzinec, Gabriela Galffy, Marko Jakopovic, Jacek Jassem, Dragana Jovanovic, Zhasmina Mihaylova, Gyula Ostoros, Christiane Thallinger and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Study of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) on the access to oncology drugs and predictive biomarkers in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
  11. Navigating Ethical Practices in the Era of High Cost Hematology.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tanja CuferMedical Faculty Ljubljana, University Clinic Golnik, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tudor E CiuleanuDepartment of Medical Oncology, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta" Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Peter BerzinecDepartment of Oncology, Hospital of St Zoerardus Zobor, Nitra, Slovakia.
Gabriela GalffyDepartment of Chest Surgery, Pest County Pulmonology Hospital, Törökbálint, Hungary.
Marko JakopovicDepartment for Respiratory Disease Jordanovic, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Jacek JassemDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Dragana JovanovicDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Pulmonology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Zhasmina MihaylovaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Gyula OstorosDepartment of Pulmunology, National Koranyi Institute of Pulmunology, Budapest, Hungary.
Christiane ThallingerDepartment of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna - General Hospital, Vienna, Austria and Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG).ORCID 0000-0003-2714-535X
Milada ZemanovaDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Christoph ZielinskiVienna Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna - General Hospital, Vienna, Austria and Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improved substantially in the last decades. Novel targeted and immune-oncologic drugs were introduced into routine treatment. Despite accelerated development and subsequent drug registrations by the European Medicinal Agency (EMA), novel drugs for NSCLC are poorly accessible in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe Central European Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a survey among experts from 10 CEE countries to provide an overview on the availability of novel drugs for NSCLC and time from registration to reimbursement decision in their countries.

resultsAlthough first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors were reimbursed and available in all countries, for other registered therapies-even for ALK inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors in first-line-there were apparent gaps in availability and/or reimbursement. There was a trend for better availability of drugs with longer time from EMA marketing authorization. Substantial differences in access to novel drugs among CEE countries were observed. In general, the availability of drugs is not in accordance with the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS), as defined by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Time spans between drug registrations and national decisions on reimbursement vary greatly, from less than 3 months in one country to more than 1 year in the majority of countries.

conclusionThe access to novel drugs for NSCLC in CEE countries is suboptimal. To enable access to the most effective compounds within the shortest possible time, reimbursement decisions should be faster and ESMO MCBS should be incorporated into decision making.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsPharmaceutical PreparationsEuropeHumansMedical OncologyPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID32162818
PMCPMC7066717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.