Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162750›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2020

Patient perspectives on the diagnostic journey to a monogenic diabetes diagnosis: Barriers and facilitators.

Yue Guan, Kristin A Maloney, Toni I Pollin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Treatment Options for Patients with Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY): A Systematic Review of Literature: 2026 Update.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yue GuanBehavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8521-1859
Kristin A MaloneyDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8607-1146
Toni I PollinDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6402-746X
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USEmory University · US

Funding

Genomic Diagnosis and Individualized Therapy of Highly Penetrant Genetic Diabetes (Administrative Supplment)U01HG007775 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI POLLIN, TONI I. · 2014 to 2018
$4.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most monogenic diabetes is misdiagnosed as either type 1 or type 2 diabetes (T1D/T2D). Few studies have examined the diagnostic challenges from the patients' perspective. This qualitative study aimed to investigate patients' journeys to obtaining a diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) by elucidating the range of factors that can act as barriers and facilitators throughout this process. We recruited participants from the Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program (PDMP) at University of Maryland and used respondent-driven sampling to recruit additional patients. We conducted qualitative phone interviews between October 2016 and June 2017 with nine patients with diagnoses of monogenic diabetes (one HNF4A-MODY, seven GCK-MODY, and one HNF1A-MODY) and one parent of a patient with INS-MODY. Interview data were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed both inductively and deductively using thematic content analysis. All patients were female, with a mean age of 35 (range: 7-67 years). The amount of time these patients were misdiagnosed ranged from a few months to 41 years. We identified barriers and facilitators in three broad themes: (a) patient-related (nature of MODY symptoms, perceived test utility, individual personality); (b) provider-related (provider awareness and knowledge, provider communication); and (c) healthcare system-related (cost of testing, access to knowledgeable providers, patient education, and support resources). The diverse range of barriers and facilitators reiterates the complexity of the MODY diagnostic process. Limited awareness and knowledge of MODY from healthcare professionals and patients themselves account for most diagnostic delays described in this study. Efforts to promote awareness of MODY and expand access to screening and testing may result in quicker diagnosis and ensure the downstream benefits of proper treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationYoung Adultaccessbarrierseducationfacilitatorsgenetic testingMODYmonogenic diabetesservice delivery models

Identifiers

PMID32162750
PMCPMC7486254
OpenAlexW3012288340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.