Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162719›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2020

Motor development in infancy and spine shape in early old age: Findings from a British birth cohort study.

Fiona R Saunders, Jennifer S Gregory, Anastasia V Pavlova, Stella G Muthuri, Rebecca J Hardy, Kathryn R Martin, Rebecca J Barr, Judith E Adams, Diana Kuh, Richard M Aspden and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Motor development in infancy and spine shape in early old age: Findings from a British birth cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fiona R SaundersSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7130-6777
Jennifer S GregorySchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6328-4560
Anastasia V PavlovaSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1633-3411
Stella G MuthuriMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, London, UK.
Rebecca J HardyMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9949-0799
Kathryn R MartinSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1053-069X
Rebecca J BarrSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4820-4240
Judith E AdamsManchester Academic Health Science Centre and Radiology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Diana KuhMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7386-2857
Richard M AspdenSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0693-1194
Rachel CooperDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Research Centre for Musculoskeletal Science and Sports Medicine, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3370-5720
Alex IrelandDepartment of Life Sciences, Research Centre for Musculoskeletal Science and Sports Medicine, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1094-9183
University of Aberdeen · GBMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GBManchester Metropolitan University · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12019/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12019/2Medical Research Council MC_UU_12019/4Medical Research Council MR/L010399/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spine shape changes dramatically in early life, influenced by attainment of developmental milestones such as independent walking. Whether these associations persist across life is unknown. Therefore, we investigated associations between developmental milestones and spine shape, as determined using statistical shape models (SSMs) of lumbar spine from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans in 1327 individuals (688 female) at 60 to 64 years in the MRC National Survey of Health and Development. Lumbar lordosis angle (L4 inferior endplate to T12 superior endplate) was measured using the two-line Cobb method. In analyses adjusted for sex, height, lean and fat mass, socioeconomic position, and birthweight, later walking age was associated with greater lordosis described by SSM1 (regression coefficient, 0.023; 95% CI, 0.000-0.047; P = .05) and direct angle measurement. Modest associations between walking age and less variation in anterior-posterior vertebral size caudally (SSM6) were also observed (0.021; 95% CI, -0.002 to 0.044; P = .07). Sex interactions showed that later walking was associated with larger relative vertebral anterior-posterior dimensions in men (SSM3; -0.043; 95% CI, -0.075 to 0.01; P = .01) but not women (0.018; 95% CI, -0.0007 to 0.043; P = .17). Similar associations were observed between age at independent standing and SSMs but there was little evidence of association between sitting age and spine shape. Unadjusted associations between walking age and SSMs 1 and 6 remained similar after adjustment for potential confounders and mediators. This suggests that these associations may be explained by altered mechanical loading of the spine during childhood growth, although other factors could contribute. Early life motor development, particularly walking, may have a lasting effect on the features of spine morphology with clinical significance.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentWalkingCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedSpinegrowthloadingmechano-adaptation

Identifiers

PMID32162719
PMCPMC8641380
OpenAlexW3011859816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.