Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162661›Full record

ReviewNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2020

Time for clinical decision support systems tailoring individual patient therapy to improve renal and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes and nephropathy.

Dick de Zeeuw, Hiddo J L Heerspink

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Up-Date on Diabetic Nephropathy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Precision Nephrology in Patients with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dick de ZeeuwDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hiddo J L HeerspinkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current guideline treatment for patients with diabetes and nephropathy to lower the high risk of renal and cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality is based on results of clinical studies that have tested new drugs in large groups of patients with diabetes and high renal/CV risk. Although this has delivered breakthrough therapies like angiotensin receptor blockers, the residual renal/CV risk remains extremely high. Many subsequent trials have tried to further reduce this residual renal/CV risk, without much success. Post hoc analyses have indicated that these failures are, at least partly, due to a large variability in response between and within the patients. The current 'group approach' to designing and evaluating new drugs, as well as group-oriented drug registration and guideline recommendations, does not take this individual response variation into account. Like with antibiotics and cancer treatment, a more individual approach is warranted to effectively optimize individual results. New tools to better evaluate the individual risk change have been developed for improved clinical trial design and to avoid trial failures. One of these tools, the composite multiple parameter response efficacy score , is based on monitoring changes in all available risk factors and integrating them into a prediction of ultimate renal and CV risk reduction. This score has also been modelled into a clinical decision support system for use in monitoring and changing the therapy in individual patients to protect them from renal/CV events. In conclusion, future treatment of renal/CV risk in diabetes should transition from an era of 'one size fits all' into the new era of 'a fit for each size'.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDiabetes MellitusDiabetic NephropathiesHumansKidney DiseasesResearch DesignRisk Factorsdiabeteskidneypersonalized medicineresponse variation

Identifiers

PMID32162661
PMCPMC7066539
OpenAlexW3010650081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.