Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162445›Full record

SynthesisOrthopaedic surgery2020

Poor Outcomes of Children and Adolescents with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-Analysis Based on Clinical Studies.

Yingpu Chen, Xiaojun Zhang, Hao Guo, Na Liu, Jing Ren, Chao Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orthopaedic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Risk factors of avascular femoral head necrosis after a pediatric femoral neck fracture: a 15-year follow up and an adjustment to the Delbet classification.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fractures of the Proximal Femur in Childhood: A Review.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yingpu ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Xi'an Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Xiaojun ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Tongchuan, Tongchuan, China.
Hao GuoDepartment of Orthopedics, Xi'an Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Na LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Xi'an Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Jing RenDepartment of Orthopedics, Xi'an Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Chao LuDepartment of Orthopedics, Xi'an Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5155-7798
Xi'an Honghui Hospital · CNThe People's Hospital Tongling · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2017M613179Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China 2017JM8118the Project for Development and clinical application of fracture healing period S2018-YF-YBSF-0265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo comprehensively assess the differences in outcome between open reduction and closed reduction for children and adolescents with femoral neck fractures.

methodsBased on the predetermined strategies, eligible studies were obtained by searching Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases (retrieval time: June 2018) and through manual retrieval for paper documents. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) and risk ratios (RR) were used as evaluation indexes. Moreover, the results of avascular necrosis, coxa vara, or non-union were compared between open reduction and closed reduction under random or fixed effects models. After sensitivity analysis was carried out, publication bias was evaluated for the eligible studies using Egger's test.

resultsSix studies were included in our meta-analysis. No significant heterogeneity was found among the included studies (P ≥ 0.05) and, thus, the fixed effects model was used for merging the effect sizes of avascular necrosis (RR [95% CI] = 0.50 [0.26, 0.98], P = 0.04), coxa vara (RR [95% CI] = 0.16 [0.04, 0.70], P = 0.01), and non-union (RR [95% CI] = 0.22 [0.05, 0.93], P = 0.04). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the results of avascular necrosis were not stable (RR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.25 1.17, P = 0.12), while those of coxa vara and non-union were stable. There was no significant publication bias among the eligible studies (t = -0.70, P = 0.522).

conclusionFemoral neck fractures treated by open reduction had less adverse outcomes compared with those treated by closed reduction.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalOpen Fracture ReductionAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFemoral Neck FracturesHumansInfantMalePostoperative ComplicationsAvascular necrosisClosed reductionFemoral neck fractureMeta-analysisOpen reduction

Identifiers

PMID32162445
PMCPMC7189036
OpenAlexW3012089257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.