ArticleCancer2020
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part II: Progress toward Healthy People 2020 objectives for 4 common cancers.
Article in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.
- Race, ethnicity, and prior colorectal screening test use in CONFIRM colonoscopy vs fecal immunochemical testing trial participants.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Trial
- Cancer Risk Factors, Screening, and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation Across the U.S. Urban-to-Frontier Continuum.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2026Article
- Trends and disparities in mortality due to secondary malignant neoplasm of the brain and cerebral meninges in the United States (1999-2024).Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Intelligent diagnosis of ovarian cancer in PET/CT imaging based on KiteNet-MobileNetv3 fusion and CarveMix augmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Differences in Breast Cancer Care Between Rural Women Undergoing Treatment at a Referral Center and Those Treated Locally.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Survival and Predictors in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Surgery for Spinal Metastases: Insights From a Single-Center Cohort.International journal of breast cancer · 2026Article
- The Effectiveness ofCancers · 2025Article
- The multifaceted impact of circadian disruption on cancer risk: a systematic review of insights and economic implications.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Review
- Current insights into breast and ovarian cancer risk: a contemporary review.Minerva surgery · 2025Review
- Breast cancer beliefs and screening behaviors among South Asian immigrant women living in the United States.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Impact of Medicaid expansion on stage of diagnosis of lung cancer for rural and urban patients in New Hampshire.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025Article
- Optimizing tracking and completion of follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal stool tests at health systems participating in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Representativeness of Patients With Lung Cancer in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System.The Permanente journal · 2024Observational
- Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Regional Safety-Net Health System over a 10-Year Period: Lessons for Population Health.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Observational
- Emergence and impact of theranostic-nanoformulation of triple therapeutics for combination cancer therapy.Smart medicine · 2024Review
- Biomarker Testing Trends in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Live in Rural Areas and Urban Clusters in the US.The oncologist · 2023Article
- Long-term Cancer Survival Trends by Updated Summary Stage.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023Article
- Impact of functional disability on health-care use and medical costs among cancer survivors.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2023Article
- Factors associated with breast cancer screening services use among women in the United States: An application of the Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use.Preventive medicine · 2023Article
- Patterns in Cancer Incidence Among People Younger Than 50 Years in the US, 2010 to 2019.JAMA network open · 2023Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries collaborate to provide annual updates on cancer occurrence and trends in the United States and to address a special topic of interest. Part I of this report focuses on national cancer statistics, and part 2 characterizes progress in achieving select Healthy People 2020 cancer objectives.
methodsFor this report, the authors selected objectives-including death rates, cancer screening, and major risk factors-related to 4 common cancers (lung, colorectal, female breast, and prostate). Baseline values, recent values, and the percentage change from baseline to recent values were examined overall and by select sociodemographic characteristics. Data from national surveillance systems were obtained from the Healthy People 2020 website.
resultsTargets for death rates were met overall and in most sociodemographic groups, but not among males, blacks, or individuals in rural areas, although these groups did experience larger decreases in rates compared with other groups. During 2007 through 2017, cancer death rates decreased 15% overall, ranging from -4% (rural) to -22% (metropolitan). Targets for breast and colorectal cancer screening were not yet met overall or in any sociodemographic groups except those with the highest educational attainment, whereas lung cancer screening was generally low (<10%). Targets were not yet met overall for cigarette smoking, recent smoking cessation, excessive alcohol use, or obesity but were met for secondhand smoke exposure and physical activity. Some sociodemographic groups did not meet targets or had less improvement than others toward reaching objectives.
conclusionsMonitoring trends in cancer risk factors, screening test use, and mortality can help assess the progress made toward decreasing the cancer burden in the United States. Although many interventions to reduce cancer risk factors and promote healthy behaviors are proven to work, they may not be equitably applied or work well in every community. Implementing cancer prevention and control interventions that are sustainable, focused, and culturally appropriate may boost success in communities with the greatest need, ensuring that all Americans can access a path to long, healthy, cancer-free lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.