Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162325›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2020

Intergenerational effects of mother's early rearing experience on offspring treatment and socioemotional development.

Ashley M Sproul Bassett, Elizabeth K Wood, Stephen G Lindell, Melanie L Schwandt, Christina S Barr, Stephen J Suomi, James D Higley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley M Sproul BassettDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8102-1062
Elizabeth K WoodDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6407-295X
Stephen G LindellSection of Comparative Behavioral Genomics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, NIH, Rockville, MD, USA.
Melanie L SchwandtLaboratory of Clinical Studies, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Christina S BarrSection of Comparative Behavioral Genomics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, NIH, Rockville, MD, USA.
Stephen J SuomiSection of Comparative Ethology, Eunice Shriver Kennedy National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Poolesville, MD, USA.
James D HigleyDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3745-3893
Brigham Young University · USNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · US

Funding

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Intramural programIntramural NIH HHS Z99 AA999999NIAAA NIH HHS Intramural programOffice of Research and Creative Activities, Brigham Young University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This longitudinal study spans two generations of rhesus monkeys. First, the study investigates the effects of early rearing experiences on the maternal behavior of first-generation mothers (rates of premature infant rejection) and, second, the study investigates the effects of maternal rejection on the behavior of second-generation infants. Rhesus macaque mother-infant dyads (Macaca mulatta-N = 176) were observed twice weekly, with each session lasting 300 s. First-generation mothers were raised in one of three conditions: as mother-reared controls (MR; [n = 95]), in peer groups (PR; raised without adults but with constant access to three same-aged peers [n = 49]), or with an inanimate surrogate (SPR; raised with an inanimate fleece-covered, surrogate mother and limited daily peer-group interactions [n = 32]). Second-generation infants were all raised by their differentially reared mothers and statistically grouped into one of two groups: those that were rejected by their mothers beginning at a more-typical weaning age (controls), starting in the third month of life (n = 108), and those that were prematurely rejected, with mothers showing rejections before the third month of infant life (n = 68). Overall, PR mothers exhibited the highest rates of premature infant rejection, except for month 1 of infant life, when SPR mothers exhibited the highest rates of rejection. Intriguingly, after month 1, SPR mothers showed high rates of infant cradling and seldom rejected their infants. Independent of their mothers' early rearing environment, prematurely rejected infants displayed more aggression and passive vigilance, and were cradled and groomed less by their mothers, and there was evidence that the overall rates of rejection after the first 2 months of life had a cumulative negative effect on the developing infant. Post hoc analyses of plasma cortisol levels showed that the prematurely rejected infants had higher cortisol concentrations, suggesting a high level of stress in the prematurely rejected infants. These results suggest that maternal presence during infancy has long-term effects on a female's future maternal skills which, in turn, have intergenerational consequences for the socioemotional development of second-generation infants.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornEmotionsLongitudinal StudiesMacaca mulattaMaternal BehaviorSocial Environmentearly experienceintergenerational effectsmother-infant relationsrhesus monkeyssensitive parenting

Identifiers

PMID32162325
PMCPMC8527389
OpenAlexW3011625721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.