ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2020
Effectiveness of sleep surgery versus a mandibular advancement device for obstructive sleep apnea in terms of nocturnal cardiac autonomic activity.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Classifying Model of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Heart Rate Variability in a Large Korean Population.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Trial
- Heart Rate Variability (HRV) in Patients with Sleep Apnea and COPD: A Comprehensive Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Mandibular Advancement Devices in Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Its Effects on the Cardiovascular System: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Consensus Statements among European Sleep Surgery Experts on Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Part 2 Decision-Making in Surgical Management and Peri-Operative Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The 24-Hour Cardiac Autonomic Activity in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- The differences between daytime and nighttime heart rate variability may usefully predict the apnea-hypopnea index in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSleep surgery and mandibular advancement devices (MAD) are treatments for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but their comparative efficacy remains unclear. We compared their efficacy using various parameters.
methodsSubjects treated for OSA with sleep surgery or MAD (n = 30/group)-matched for sex, body mass index (BMI), and baseline apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)-were enrolled. The efficacy of these treatments according to polysomnographic parameters, sleep quality questionnaires, and heart rate variability (HRV) time- and frequency-domain parameters were compared between pre-treatment and 3-month post-treatment.
resultsPolysomnographic and sleep quality questionnaire parameters improved significantly in both groups. In time-domain HRV analysis, average normal-to-normal intervals increased significantly in the surgery (942.2 ± 140.8 to 994.6 ± 143.1, P = 0.008) and MAD (901.1 ± 131.7 to 953.7 ± 123.1, P = 0.002) groups. Low frequency (LF) decreased significantly in the surgery group (P = 0.012); high frequency (HF) remained unchanged in both groups. The LF/HF ratio decreased in both groups (2.9 ± 1.8 to 2.3 ± 1.7, P = 0.017, vs. 3.0 ± 1.8 to 2.4 ± 1.4, P = 0.025). Normalized high frequency increased significantly in both groups (31.0 ± 13.2 to 36.8 ± 13.7, P = 0.009, vs. 29.1 ± 10.7 to 33.7 ± 12.5, P = 0.024), in contrast to normalized low frequency. However, no HRV parameter changes differed significantly between the groups after adjusting for age, BMI, and AHI.
conclusionSleep surgery and MAD are equally effective treatments for OSA according to cardiac autonomic activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32162279What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.