ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
A comprehensive analysis of e-waste legislation worldwide.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 206 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatiotemporal Distribution of Household WEEE and Anthropogenic Mineral Reserves in China from 1978 to 2050.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Dermatology- Environment Intersection: A Call for Advocacy and Action.Indian dermatology online journal · 2025Article
- Minimizing the Dermatological Consequences of Exposure to E-waste.Indian dermatology online journal · 2025Article
- Carbazole-Phosphazene Based Polymer for Efficient Extraction of Gold and Precious Elements from Electronic Waste.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Current recycling innovations to utilize e-waste in sustainable green metal manufacturing.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024Review
- Green and Social Regulation of Second Hand Appliance Markets: the Case of Air Conditioners in the Philippines.Circular economy and sustainability · 2022Article
- Analysis of Critical Success Factors to Design E-waste Collection Policy in India: A Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Global research into the relationship between electronic waste and health over the last 10 years: A scientometric analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Ticking time bomb: implications of the COVID-19 lockdown on e-waste management in developing countries.UCL open. Environment · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The improper disposal and informal processing of e-waste have raised serious concerns for the environment and human health worldwide. A variety of legislative frameworks have been implemented to regulate e-waste management and upcycling in order to prevent environmental pollution and adopt resource reuse. Current e-waste legislation in different countries mostly include restrictions on e-waste import/export, regulations for recycling specific categories of e-waste, and Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). This article serves as a comprehensive commentary to weigh the advantages and drawbacks of the different e-waste legislation enforced around the world. Though each country's e-waste legislation is enframed to address the country-specific problems, the legislation is mostly not holistic, leading to different management issues. A variety of e-waste management issues prevalent in most countries (with e-waste specific legislation) have been listed and categorized for better understanding of the status quo. Further, the article proposes a generic e-waste management model catering to requirements of countries around the world. The implementation of such a model for Europe, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Australia has been illustrated to show that the model can suit both developed and developing countries with contrasting e-waste management issues. The challenges that would arise in implementing an effective legislation and mechanisms for overcoming these challenges have also been discussed. To conclude, the role of governing bodies in tackling the future e-waste problems has been highlighted. In total, the article promotes scaling up the feasibility and efficacy of the implementation of e-waste policies across the globe in the coming years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.