Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162215›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2020

Development of a deep learning-based method to identify "good" regions of a cryo-electron microscopy grid.

Yuichi Yokoyama, Tohru Terada, Kentaro Shimizu, Kouki Nishikawa, Daisuke Kozai, Atsuhiro Shimada, Akira Mizoguchi, Yoshinori Fujiyoshi, Kazutoshi Tani

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Developing Graphene Grids for Cryoelectron Microscopy.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yuichi YokoyamaGraduate School of Interdisciplinary Information Studies, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Tohru TeradaInterfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. tterada@iu.a.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7091-0646
Kentaro ShimizuInterfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Kouki NishikawaTMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.
Daisuke KozaiCellular and Structural Physiology Institute, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan.
Atsuhiro ShimadaDepartment of Applied Life Science, Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1193, Japan.
Akira MizoguchiGraduate School of Medicine, Mie University, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Yoshinori FujiyoshiTMDU Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8070-1493
Kazutoshi TaniGraduate School of Medicine, Mie University, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4835-154X
The University of Tokyo · JPMie University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPGifu University · JPNagoya University · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP19ae0101046Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP19am0101107Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 15H05775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) have enabled protein structure determination at atomic resolutions. Cryo-EM specimens are prepared by rapidly freezing a protein solution on a metal grid coated with a holey carbon film; this results in the formation of an ice film on each hole. The thickness of the ice film is a critical factor for high-resolution structure determination; ice that is too thick degrades the contrast of the protein image while ice that is too thin excludes the protein from the hole or denatures the protein. Therefore, trained researchers need to manually select "good" regions with appropriate ice thicknesses for imaging. To reduce the time spent on such tasks, we developed a deep learning program consisting of a "detector" and a "classifier" to identify good regions from low-magnification EM images. In our method, the holes in a low-magnification EM image are detected via a detector, and the ice image on each hole is classified as either good or bad via a classifier. The detector detected more than 95% of the holes regardless of the type of samples. The classifier was trained for different types of samples because the appropriate ice thickness varies between sample types. The accuracies of the classifiers were 93.8% for a soluble protein sample (β-galactosidase) and 95.3% for a membrane protein sample (bovine heart cytochrome c oxidase). In addition, we found that a training data set containing ~ 2100 hole images from 300 low-magnification EM images was sufficient to obtain good accuracy, such as higher than 90%. We expect that the throughput of the cryo-EM data collection step will be greatly improved by using our method.

Indexed as

Cryo-EMDeep learningGridIce thicknessLow-magnification image

Identifiers

PMID32162215
PMCPMC7242580
OpenAlexW3011544698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.