ReviewBiophysical reviews2020
Development of a deep learning-based method to identify "good" regions of a cryo-electron microscopy grid.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- CryoEMNet driven symmetry-aware molecular reconstruction through deep learning enhanced electron microscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- DeepEM Playground: Bringing deep learning to electron microscopy labs.Journal of microscopy · 2025Article
- RNA sample optimization for cryo-EM analysis.Nature protocols · 2025Review
- The advent of preventive high-resolution structural histopathology by artificial-intelligence-powered cryogenic electron tomography.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Review
- Integrating machine learning to advance epitope mapping.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Ice thickness monitoring for cryo-EM grids by interferometry imaging.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Better, Faster, Cheaper: Recent Advances in Cryo-Electron Microscopy.Annual review of biochemistry · 2022Review
- IceBreaker: Software for high-resolution single-particle cryo-EM with non-uniform ice.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2022Article
- Developing Graphene Grids for Cryoelectron Microscopy.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Application of Monolayer Graphene and Its Derivative in Cryo-EM Sample Preparation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Biophysical Reviews: 2020-looking back, going forward.Biophysical reviews · 2020Article
- Biophysical Reviews' national biophysical society partnership program.Biophysical reviews · 2020Article
- Overview of the big data bioinformatics symposium (2SCA) at BSJ2019.Biophysical reviews · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) have enabled protein structure determination at atomic resolutions. Cryo-EM specimens are prepared by rapidly freezing a protein solution on a metal grid coated with a holey carbon film; this results in the formation of an ice film on each hole. The thickness of the ice film is a critical factor for high-resolution structure determination; ice that is too thick degrades the contrast of the protein image while ice that is too thin excludes the protein from the hole or denatures the protein. Therefore, trained researchers need to manually select "good" regions with appropriate ice thicknesses for imaging. To reduce the time spent on such tasks, we developed a deep learning program consisting of a "detector" and a "classifier" to identify good regions from low-magnification EM images. In our method, the holes in a low-magnification EM image are detected via a detector, and the ice image on each hole is classified as either good or bad via a classifier. The detector detected more than 95% of the holes regardless of the type of samples. The classifier was trained for different types of samples because the appropriate ice thickness varies between sample types. The accuracies of the classifiers were 93.8% for a soluble protein sample (β-galactosidase) and 95.3% for a membrane protein sample (bovine heart cytochrome c oxidase). In addition, we found that a training data set containing ~ 2100 hole images from 300 low-magnification EM images was sufficient to obtain good accuracy, such as higher than 90%. We expect that the throughput of the cryo-EM data collection step will be greatly improved by using our method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.