ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2020
Intrathecal IgM as a Prognostic Marker in Multiple Sclerosis.
Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intrathecal Immunoglobulin A Synthesis in Multiple Sclerosis: From Biological Aspects to Clinical Relevance.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Intrathecal IgG and IgM synthesis correlates with neurodegeneration markers and corresponds to meningeal B cell presence in MS.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Increased intrathecal neurofilament light and immunoglobulin M predict severe disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the great challenges related to multiple sclerosis (MS) research is the identification of markers of prognosis and treatment response. In the last couple of decades, an association between intrathecally produced immunoglobulin M (IgM) and a more severe course of the disease has been suggested. Therefore, the objective of this literature review was to gather and review evidence from studies on intrathecally produced IgM as a prognostic marker of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) converting to clinically definite MS (CDMS), the prognosis of MS and treatment response in patients with MS. This was accomplished through a systematic literature search of the PubMed database, which resulted in 719 hits that were then systematically assessed with well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. This process resulted in 29 relevant research articles. The combined evidence from the current literature suggests that intrathecal IgM is a negative prognostic marker that identifies patients with CIS who have a higher risk of converting to CDMS and patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) with a higher risk of a more aggressive disease course. However, a few studies, some with large studied populations, have reported conflicting results regarding MS prognosis. Further research is needed to establish a more accurate estimate of the effect of intrathecal IgM on the disease course of MS. Further research is also necessary to evaluate the potential prognostic value of intrathecal IgM in treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.