Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162193›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2020

Long-term work retention after treatment for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Angela Gem de Boer, Steffen Torp, Adela Popa, Trine Horsboel, Vesna Zadnik, Yakir Rottenberg, Edit Bardi, Ute Bultmann, Linda Sharp

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A multidisciplinary intervention to support return to work of individuals with breast cancer: a prospective feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Financial hardship experience in middle- and older-aged patients with advanced lung cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Cancer survivorship in malignant melanoma.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Associations of formal and informal organizational support with employed cancer survivors' intent to stay.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Re: Factors associated with employment outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic scoping review spanning a decade of international research.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  17. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer work after cancer global challenges and solutions white paper: key findings and recommendations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  18. Self-reported late effects and chronic fatigue, information needs and follow-up in long-term survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma-a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Angela Gem de BoerCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Steffen TorpDepartment of Health, Social & Welfare Studies, University College of South-Eastern Norway, Notodden, Norway.
Adela PopaLucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.
Trine HorsboelThe Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vesna ZadnikInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Yakir RottenbergSharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Edit BardiKepler Universitäts Klinikum, Linz, Austria.
Ute BultmannUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Linda SharpPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. linda.sharp@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9515-1722
Danish Cancer Society · DKHadassah Medical Center · ILInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIKepler Universitätsklinikum · ATLucian Blaga University of Sibiu · RONetherlands Center for Occupational Diseases · NLNewcastle University · GBUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of South-Eastern Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlmost half of people diagnosed with cancer are working age. Survivors have increased risk of unemployment, but little is known about long-term work retention. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed work retention and associated factors in long-term cancer survivors.

methodsWe searched Medline/Pubmed, Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL for studies published 01/01/2000-08/01/2019 reporting work retention in adult cancer survivors ≥ 2 years post-diagnosis. Survivors had to be in paid work at diagnosis. Pooled prevalence of long-term work retention was estimated. Factors associated with work retention from multivariate analysis were synthesized.

resultsTwenty-nine articles, reporting 21 studies/datasets including 14,207 cancer survivors, were eligible. Work retention was assessed 2-14 years post-diagnosis. Fourteen studies were cross-sectional, five were prospective, and two contained both cross-sectional and prospective elements. No studies were scored as high quality. The pooled estimate of prevalence of long-term work retention in cancer survivors working at diagnosis was 0.73 (95%CI 0.69-0.77). The proportion working at 2-2.9 years was 0.72; at 3-3.9 years 0.80; at 4-4.9 years 0.75; at 5-5.9 years 0.74; and 6+ years 0.65. Pooled estimates did not differ by cancer site, geographical area, or study design. Seven studies assessed prognostic factors for work retention: older age, receiving chemotherapy, negative health outcomes, and lack of work adjustments were associated with not working.

conclusionAlmost three-quarters of long-term cancer survivors working at diagnosis retain work. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: These findings are pertinent for guidelines on cancer survivorship care. Professionals could focus support on survivors most likely to have poor long-term work outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultCancer SurvivorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesRehabilitation, VocationalCancerEmploymentLongitudinal studiesMeta-analysisProspective studiesReturn-to-workWork abilityWork retention

Identifiers

PMID32162193
PMCPMC7182621
OpenAlexW3011093276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.