Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162192›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2020

Clinico-pathologic features, treatment and outcomes of breast cancer during pregnancy or the post-partum period.

Ciara C O'Sullivan, Sheeba Irshad, Zheyu Wang, Zhuojun Tang, Christopher Umbricht, Gary L Rosner, Mindy S Christianson, Vered Stearns, Karen Lisa Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Postpartum breast cancer: mechanisms underlying its worse prognosis, treatment implications, and fertility preservation.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ciara C O'SullivanJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sheeba IrshadJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Zheyu WangJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Zhuojun TangJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Christopher UmbrichtJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Gary L RosnerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mindy S ChristiansonJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Vered StearnsJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Karen Lisa SmithJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. ksmith60@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Discovery and validation of early molecular breast cancer risk markers in benign breast diseaseR01CA222779 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI UMBRICHT, CHRISTOPHER B · 2018 to 2023
$2.3M
YOUNG WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER PROGRAM AT JOHNS HOPKINS: SURVIVING AND THRIVINGU58DP005410 · DP · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STEARNS, VERED · 2014 to 2014
$340k
CDC HHS U58DP005410NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP005410NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222779NIH/NCI P30CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer during pregnancy (BC-P) or the first year post-partum (BC-PP) is rare and whether it differs from breast cancer (BC) in young women not associated with pregnancy is uncertain.

methodsWe queried our institutional database for BC-P and BC-PP cases and matched controls with BC not associated with pregnancy diagnosed between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 2013. We performed two parallel retrospective cohort studies evaluating clinico-pathologic features, treatment and outcomes for BC-P and BC-PP cases compared to their controls.

resultsIn our population of 65 BC-P cases, 135 controls for BC-P cases, 75 BC-PP cases and 145 controls for BC-PP cases, high grade and estrogen receptor-negativity were more frequent in both case groups than their controls. Among those with stage I-III BC, patterns of local therapy were similar for both case groups and their controls, with the majority undergoing surgery and radiation. Over three-fourths of those with stage I-III BC received chemotherapy. BC-P cases tolerated chemotherapy well, with the majority receiving doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks. On multivariate analyses of those with stage I-III BC, BC-P cases had non-significantly higher hazards of recurrence and death compared to their controls, while BC-PP cases had non-significantly lower hazards of recurrence and death compared to their controls.

conclusionBC-P and BC-PP were associated with adverse clinic-pathologic features in our population. However, we did not observe inferior outcomes for BC-P or BC-PP compared to controls, likely due to receipt of aggressive multi-modality therapy.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCombined Modality TherapyErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy Complications, NeoplasticPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRetrospective StudiesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast cancerPost-partumPregnancyPrognosisYoung women

Identifiers

PMID32162192
PMCPMC7398490
OpenAlexW3011919016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.