ArticleAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry2020
Psychiatry Resident Attitudes Toward Practice Habit Data.
Article in Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Senior Residents' Perceived Competence in Evidence-Based Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis descriptive study queries the attitudes of psychiatry residents regarding provision of practice habit data to trainees by residency programs, as required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Identifying trainee perspectives may assist program directors in tailoring practice habit data reporting to better engage residents and to increase resident-reported adherence to the ACGME requirement.
methodsResidents at a large, hospital-based adult psychiatry training program completed an anonymous survey of attitudes regarding practice habit data, including perceptions of the residency program's current reporting, preferences toward mechanisms of delivering this data, and perceived relative utility of five hypothetical domains of practice habit data.
resultsOf 61 eligible residents, 52 (85%) completed surveys. Only 29 (56%) recalled receiving prior-year individual practice habit data, and only 10 (19%) recalled receiving team-based data. Seventy-five percent desired more practice habit data. Out of five hypothetical thematic domains for practice habit reporting, residents preferred patient-oriented domains as opposed to process-oriented domains. Resident concerns about dissemination of these data included confidentiality, effect on evaluations, and difficulty translating data to changes in clinical practice.
conclusionsResidents generally desire increased dissemination of practice habit data that focuses on patient-oriented measures such as adherence to disease-specific guidelines and is both individual and team-based. Residency programs may benefit their trainees and improve resident-reported adherence to the ACGME requirement both by taking resident preferences into account and by addressing concerns about confidentiality when providing practice habit data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.