Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162161›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2020

Knowledge and sources of information on umbilical cord blood donation in pregnant women.

Caterina Grano, Valentina Scafa, Erika Zucaro, Rubi Abad, Caterina Lombardo, Cristiano Violani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Hybrid umbilical cord blood banking: literature review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How Knowledge about Stem Cells Influences Attitudes towards Breastfeeding: Case Study of Polish Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caterina GranoDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy. caterina.grano@uniroma1.it.
Valentina ScafaDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Erika ZucaroDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Rubi AbadDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Caterina LombardoDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Cristiano ViolaniDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of umbilical cord blood (UCB) holds promise for the treatment of a wide spectrum of diseases. However, information on UCB donation is not widespread or accurate among expectant women. The aim of this study is to evaluate pregnant women's knowledge of UCB donation, their main sources of information and their satisfaction with the knowledge possessed. Women (N = 375) in the last semester of pregnancy completed questionnaires evaluating sociodemographics, knowledge of UCB donation, past donation, sources of information, satisfaction with the information and the desire to have received more information. Women were aware of the possibility of donating UCB (97.5%) although, on average, they reported not having enough knowledge of donation possibilities, procedures to be followed and uses of UCB (2.51, on a 5-point scale). Considering knowledge satisfaction, 28% were not at all satisfied. Only 2.8% felt fully prepared and the great majority (75.2%) would have liked to have received more information. The main source of information was the Internet (51.2%). Gynecologists and midwives were indicated by only 24.4% and 18.6% of women, respectively. Age and education were significantly correlated with UCB knowledge. Chi-square tests evidenced that those who reported professional sources of information (gynecologists, obstetricians, prenatal courses) did not need additional information. Conversely, mothers who turned to other mothers for information were more likely to desire further information. Most mothers report the Internet as the main source of information. Providing accurate information through official sources may result in a more positive attitude toward donation.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultFemaleFetal BloodHumansPatient SatisfactionPregnancyCord blood donationDonationPregnant womenPublic cord blood bankingUmbilical cord blood (UCB)

Identifiers

PMID32162161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.