Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162158›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2020

Status, Respect, and Stigma: A Qualitative Study of Non-financial Interests in Medicine.

Miriam Wiersma, Ian Kerridge, Wendy Lipworth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Influence of Disclosed and Undisclosed Funding Sources in Tobacco Harm Reduction Discourse: A Social Network Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miriam WiersmaThe University of Sydney, Sydney Health Ethics, Level 1, Medical Foundation Building, K25, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. miriam.wiersma@sydney.edu.au.
Ian KerridgeThe University of Sydney, Sydney Health Ethics, Level 1, Medical Foundation Building, K25, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Wendy LipworthThe University of Sydney, Sydney Health Ethics, Level 1, Medical Foundation Building, K25, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Funding

NHMRC Project Grant APP1059732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflicts of interest (COI) in health and medicine have been the source of considerable public and professional debate. Much of this debate has focused on financial, rather than non-financial COI, which is a significant lacuna because non-financial COI can be just as influential as financial COI. In an effort to explore the nature and effects of non-financial, as well as financial COI, we conducted semi-structured interviews with eleven Australian medical professionals regarding their experiences of, and attitudes towards, COI. We found that this group of medical professionals saw non-financial interests-most notably the pursuit of status and respect and the avoidance of stigma-as potentially conflicting with other important interests (such as patient care).

Indexed as

RespectAustraliaConflict of InterestDisclosureHumansMedicineQualitative ResearchNon-financial conflicts of interestQualitative researchRespectStatusStigma

Identifiers

PMID32162158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.