Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162152›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2020

Drug retention of secondary biologics or JAK inhibitors after tocilizumab or abatacept failure as first biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis -the ANSWER cohort study.

Kosuke Ebina, Toru Hirano, Yuichi Maeda, Wataru Yamamoto, Motomu Hashimoto, Koichi Murata, Tohru Takeuchi, Koji Nagai, Yonsu Son, Hideki Amuro and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Kosuke EbinaDepartment of Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. k-ebina@umin.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2426-1024
Toru HiranoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8467-3154
Yuichi MaedaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6831-8205
Wataru YamamotoDepartment of Health Information Management, Kurashiki Sweet Hospital, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0810-4221
Motomu HashimotoDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-060X
Koichi MurataDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-3937
Tohru TakeuchiDepartment of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0065-929X
Koji NagaiRheumatology center, Koshokai Aino Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3183-4193
Yonsu SonFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7244-7715
Hideki AmuroFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7299-2884
Akira OnishiDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3120-1273
Sadao JinnoDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3021-183X
Ryota HaraThe Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8000-3196
Masaki KatayamaDepartment of Rheumatology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0773-7238
Keiichi YamamotoDepartment of Medical Informatics, Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama, Japan.
Atsushi KumanogohDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4749-7117
Makoto HiraoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1408-7851
The University of Osaka · JPKyoto University · JPKansai Medical University · JPKobe University · JPNara Medical University · JPOsaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPOsaka Red Cross Hospital · JPWakayama Medical University · JP

Funding

The study reported in this publication uses ANSWER Cohort supported by grants from eight pharmaceutical companies (AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Ayumi, Chugai, Eisai, Janssen, Ono and Sanofi) and an information technology services company (CAC). This study is condu Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this multicenter, retrospective study was to clarify the retention of secondary biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were primarily treated by tocilizumab (TCZ) or abatacept (ABT) as first bDMARDs.

methodPatients who were treated by either TCZ (n = 145) or ABT (n = 76) and then switched to either tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), TCZ, ABT, or JAKi (including only cases switched from TCZ) from 2001 to 2019 (female 81.0%, age 59.5 years, disease duration 8.8 years; rheumatoid factor positivity 75.4%; Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein 3.7; concomitant prednisolone (PSL) dose 6.0 mg/day (51.8%) and methotrexate (MTX) dose 8.0 mg/week (56.1%); 81.9% discontinued first bDMARDs due to lack of effectiveness) were included. Drug retention and discontinuation reasons were estimated at 24 months using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted for potential confounders by Cox proportional hazards modeling.

resultsDrug retentions for each of the reasons for discontinuation were as follows: lack of effectiveness in TCZ-switched group (TNFi (59.5%), ABT (82.2%), and JAKi (84.3%); TNFi vs. ABT; P = 0.009) and ABT-switched group (TNFi (79.6%) and TCZ (92.6%); P = 0.053). Overall retention excluding non-toxic reasons and remission for discontinuation were TNFi (49.9%), ABT (72.7%), and JAKi (72.6%) (TNFi vs. ABT; P = 0.017) in the TCZ-switched group and TNFi (69.6%) and TCZ (72.4%) (P = 0.44) in the ABT-switched group.

conclusionsSwitching to ABT in TCZ-treated patients led to higher retention as compared with TNFi. Switching to TCZ in ABT-treated patients tended to lead to higher retention due to effectiveness, although total retention was similar as compared with TNFi. Key Point • This is the first retrospective, multi-center study aimed to clarify the retention rates of secondary bDMARDs or JAKi in patients with RA who were primarily being treated by TCZ or ABT as the first bDMARDs.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsJanus Kinase InhibitorsPharmaceutical PreparationsAbataceptAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAbataceptAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsJanus Kinase InhibitorsPharmaceutical PreparationstocilizumabTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAbataceptBiologicsDrug retentionJanus kinase inhibitorsRheumatoid arthritisTocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID32162152
OpenAlexW3012317449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.