Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162111›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021

Current practice patterns for initial umbilical hernia repair in the United States.

S Koebe, J Greenberg, L-C Huang, S Phillips, A Lidor, L Funk, A Shada

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07156188 (The PAPYRUS Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07156188 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The PAPYRUS Study: Permanent vs. Absorbable Sutures in PrimarY Repair of Umbilical HerniaS: A Multicentre, Single-blind, Non-inferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2026 to 2030Enrolled914ConditionsHernia Surgery, Umbilical Hernia RepairArmsPermanent Suture, Absorbable
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S KoebeUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
J GreenbergDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53736, USA.
L-C HuangAmerica Hernia Society Quality Collaborative, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
S PhillipsAmerica Hernia Society Quality Collaborative, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
A LidorDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53736, USA.
L FunkDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53736, USA.
A ShadaDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53736, USA. shada@surgery.wisc.edu.
Highland Community College - Illinois · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe approach to repairing an initial umbilical hernia (IUH) varies substantially, and this likely depends on hernia size, patient age, sex, BMI, comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, and surgeon preference. Of these, only hernia size has been widely studied. This cross-sectional study aims to look at the practice pattern of umbilical hernia repair in the United States.

methodsA retrospective study was performed using data from the America Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Patient characteristics included age, sex, hernia width, BMI, smoking status, and diabetes. Outcomes were use of mesh for repair, as well as surgical approach (open vs minimally invasive). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the independent effect of age, sex, hernia width, BMI, smoking status, and diabetes on use of mesh and approach to repair.

results3475 patients were included. 74% were men. Mesh use was more common in men (67% vs 60%, P < 0.001). Mesh was used in 33% of repairs ≤ 1 cm, and 82% of repairs > 1 cm (P < 0.001). Younger patients were less likely to receive a mesh repair (54% if age ≤ 35 vs 67% for age > 35, P < 0.001). However, on multivariate analysis, mesh use was associated with increasing hernia width (OR 5.474, 95% CI 4.7-6.3) as well as BMI (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5-2.1) but not with age or sex.

conclusionThe majority of IUH are performed open. Patient BMI and hernia defect size contribute to choice of surgical technique including use of mesh. The use of mesh in 33% of hernias below 1 cm demonstrates a gap between evidence and practice. Patient factors including patient age and sex had no impact on operative approach or use of mesh.

Indexed as

Hernia, UmbilicalHernia, VentralLaparoscopyCross-Sectional StudiesHerniorrhaphyHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshUnited StatesLaparoscopicMeshRoboticUmbilical

Identifiers

PMID32162111
OpenAlexW3012381891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.