Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32162004›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Machine learning and radiomic phenotyping of lower grade gliomas: improving survival prediction.

Yoon Seong Choi, Sung Soo Ahn, Jong Hee Chang, Seok-Gu Kang, Eui Hyun Kim, Se Hoon Kim, Rajan Jain, Seung-Koo Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yoon Seong ChoiDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, College of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Sung Soo AhnDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, College of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea. SUNGSOO@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0503-5558
Jong Hee ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seok-Gu KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Eui Hyun KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Se Hoon KimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Rajan JainDepartment of Radiology, Langone Medical Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Seung-Koo LeeDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, College of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning 2017R1D1A1B03030440Yonsei University College of Medicine 6-2016-0121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRecent studies have highlighted the importance of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutational status in stratifying biologically distinct subgroups of gliomas. This study aimed to evaluate whether MRI-based radiomic features could improve the accuracy of survival predictions for lower grade gliomas over clinical and IDH status. MATERIALS AND

methodsRadiomic features (n = 250) were extracted from preoperative MRI data of 296 lower grade glioma patients from databases at our institutional (n = 205) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)/The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) (n = 91) datasets. For predicting overall survival, random survival forest models were trained with radiomic features; non-imaging prognostic factors including age, resection extent, WHO grade, and IDH status on the institutional dataset, and validated on the TCGA/TCIA dataset. The performance of the random survival forest (RSF) model and incremental value of radiomic features were assessed by time-dependent receiver operating characteristics.

resultsThe radiomics RSF model identified 71 radiomic features to predict overall survival, which were successfully validated on TCGA/TCIA dataset (iAUC, 0.620; 95% CI, 0.501-0.756). Relative to the RSF model from the non-imaging prognostic parameters, the addition of radiomic features significantly improved the overall survival prediction accuracy of the random survival forest model (iAUC, 0.627 vs. 0.709; difference, 0.097; 95% CI, 0.003-0.209).

conclusionRadiomic phenotyping with machine learning can improve survival prediction over clinical profile and genomic data for lower grade gliomas. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics analysis with machine learning can improve survival prediction over the non-imaging factors (clinical and molecular profiles) for lower grade gliomas, across different institutions.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultBrainBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMutationPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesIsocitrate DehydrogenaseGliomaMachine learningPrognosisSurvival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.