ArticleClinical oral investigations2020
Efficacy of mouthrinses with bovine milk and milk protein isolates to accumulate casein in the in situ pellicle.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bovine milk and milk protein- promotor or inhibitor of bacterial biofilm formation at the tooth surface?BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Influence of Consumption of Nitrate-rich Beetroot Juice on Lactate Production in Saliva and Oral Biofilm - A Clinical Trial.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe adsorption of bovine milk caseins on the tooth surface might have a positive impact on the prevention of dental diseases. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of mouthrinses with different types of bovine milk and milk protein isolates to accumulate caseins in the pellicle. MATERIALS/
methodsAn indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was established to quantify the amount of caseins adsorbed into the in situ pellicle. In situ pellicle samples were collected from 2 volunteers on ceramic specimens (A = 8 cm
resultsAll mouthrinses accumulated caseins in the in situ pellicle (2.0 ± 0.7-20 ± 1.7 μg/ml) that, under native conditions, expressed no casein signal. Micellar protein association increased the adsorption of casein into the pellicle. Milk homogenization also had an influence on the casein accumulation in the pellicle. TEM analysis confirmed the integration of micellar casein into the pellicle.
conclusionThe mouthrinses altered the protein composition and the ultrastructure of the in situ pellicle to a different extent: bovine milk with 3.8% fat content and 3% micellar casein in SMUF being particularly effective. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study provides interesting perspectives for innovative prevention strategies in dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32161997What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.