Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32161783›Full record

ArticleBiology methods & protocols2017

EpiHRMAssay,

Marco Cirilli, Ines Delfino, Emilia Caboni, Rosario Muleo

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco CirilliDepartment of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, University of Tuscia, Via S. Camillo de Lellis snc, Viterbo 01100, Italy.
Ines DelfinoDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, L.go dell'Università snc, Viterbo 01100, Italy.
Emilia CaboniCouncil for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Agricultural Economics (CREA), Fruit Tree Research Center, Via di Fioranello, 52, 00134 Rome, Italy.
Rosario MuleoDepartment of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, University of Tuscia, Via S. Camillo de Lellis snc, Viterbo 01100, Italy.
Università degli Studi della Tuscia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable and cost-effective assays with adequate sensitivity are required to detect the DNA methylation profile in plants for scientific and industrial purposes. The proposed novel assay, named EpiHRMAssay, allows to quantify the overall methylation status at target loci and to enable high-throughput analyses. It combines

Indexed as

DNA methylationepigenetic regulationHigh Resolution Melting AnalysisHRMAin silico melting predictionsomaclonal variation

Identifiers

PMID32161783
PMCPMC6994072
OpenAlexW2603927430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.