Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32161547›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020

Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Patient-Controlled Intravenous Morphine Analgesia on Analgesic Use and Post-Thoracotomy Pain. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trial.

Dusica M Stamenkovic, Katarina Mladenovic, Nemanja Rancic, Vlado Cvijanovic, Nebojsa Maric, Vojislava Neskovic, Snjezana Zeba, Menelaos Karanikolas, Tihomir V Ilic

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03005548 (Cortical Modulation of Acute Post-thoracotomy Pain With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03005548 phase2completednot on this map

Cortical Modulation of Acute Post-thoracotomy Pain With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorMilitary Medical Academy, Belgrade, SerbiaRan2016 to 2018Enrolled62ConditionsPain, PostoperativeArmsTranscranial direct current stimulation, Morphine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dusica M StamenkovicDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Katarina MladenovicDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nemanja RancicMedical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia.
Vlado CvijanovicMedical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nebojsa MaricMedical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia.
Vojislava NeskovicDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Snjezana ZebaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Menelaos KaranikolasDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Tihomir V IlicMedical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia.
Military Medical Academy · RSWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used for various chronic pain conditions, but experience with tDCS for acute postoperative pain is limited. This study investigated the effect of tDCS vs. sham stimulation on postoperative morphine consumption and pain intensity after thoracotomy.

methodsThis is a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in lung cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy under general anesthesia. All patients received patient-controlled (PCA) intravenous morphine and intercostal nerve blocks at the end of surgery. The intervention group (a-tDCS, n = 31) received anodal tDCS over the left primary motor cortex (C3-Fp2) for 20 min at 1.2 mA, on five consecutive days; the control group (n = 31) received sham stimulation. Morphine consumption, number of analgesia demands, and pain intensity at rest, with movement and with cough were recorded at the following intervals: immediately before (T1), immediately after intervention (T2), then every hour for 4 h (Т3-Т6), then every 6 h (Т7-Т31) for 5 days. We recorded outcomes on postoperative days 1 and 5 and conducted a phone interview inquiring about chronic pain 1 year later (NCT03005548).

resultsA total of 62 patients enrolled, but tDCS was prematurely stopped in six patients. Fifty-five patients (27 a-tDCS, 28 sham) had three or more tDCS applications and were included in the analysis. Cumulative morphine dose in the first 120 h after surgery was significantly lower in the tDCS [77.00 (54.00-123.00) mg] compared to sham group [112.00 (79.97-173.35) mg, p = 0.043, Cohen's d = 0.42]. On postoperative day 5, maximum visual analog scale (VAS) pain score with cough was significantly lower in the tDCS group [29.00 (20.00-39.00) vs. 44.50 (30.00-61.75) mm, p = 0.018], and pain interference with cough was 80% lower [10.00 (0.00-30.00) vs. 50.00 (0.00-70.00), p = 0.013]. One year after surgery, there was no significant difference between groups with regard to chronic pain and analgesic use.

conclusionIn lung cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy, three to five tDCS sessions significantly reduced cumulative postoperative morphine use, maximum VAS pain scores with cough, and pain interference with cough on postoperative day 5, but there was no obvious long-term benefit from tDCS.

Indexed as

acute painanalgesiapain managementprospective studyrandomized double-blind studytranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32161547
PMCPMC7052845
OpenAlexW3009034624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.