Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32161525›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2020

Neural Correlates of Vocal Pitch Compensation in Individuals Who Stutter.

Anastasia G Sares, Mickael L D Deroche, Hiroki Ohashi, Douglas M Shiller, Vincent L Gracco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role of Sensory Feedback in Developmental Stuttering: A Review.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anastasia G SaresSpeech Motor Control Lab, Integrated Program in Neuroscience and School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mickael L D DerocheCentre for Research on Brain, Language, and Music, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hiroki OhashiHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, United States.
Douglas M ShillerCentre for Research on Brain, Language, and Music, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Vincent L GraccoSpeech Motor Control Lab, Integrated Program in Neuroscience and School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music · CAHaskins Laboratories · US

Funding

The Negative BOLD Response in Speech Production and Persistent StutteringR21DC015855 · NIDCD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI GRACCO, VINCENT L. · 2017 to 2018
$360k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stuttering is a disorder that impacts the smooth flow of speech production and is associated with a deficit in sensorimotor integration. In a previous experiment, individuals who stutter were able to vocally compensate for pitch shifts in their auditory feedback, but they exhibited more variability in the timing of their corrective responses. In the current study, we focused on the neural correlates of the task using functional MRI. Participants produced a vowel sound in the scanner while hearing their own voice in real time through headphones. On some trials, the audio was shifted up or down in pitch, eliciting a corrective vocal response. Contrasting pitch-shifted vs. unshifted trials revealed bilateral superior temporal activation over all the participants. However, the groups differed in the activation of middle temporal gyrus and superior frontal gyrus [Brodmann area 10 (BA 10)], with individuals who stutter displaying deactivation while controls displayed activation. In addition to the standard univariate general linear modeling approach, we employed a data-driven technique (independent component analysis, or ICA) to separate task activity into functional networks. Among the networks most correlated with the experimental time course, there was a combined auditory-motor network in controls, but the two networks remained separable for individuals who stuttered. The decoupling of these networks may account for temporal variability in pitch compensation reported in our previous work, and supports the idea that neural network coherence is disturbed in the stuttering brain.

Indexed as

altered feedbackfMRIpitchsensorimotorspeechstutteringvocalization

Identifiers

PMID32161525
PMCPMC7053555
OpenAlexW3008727628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.