Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32161455›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2020

Economic Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Systematic Literature Review.

Ike Iheanacho, Shiyuan Zhang, Denise King, Maria Rizzo, Afisi S Ismaila

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05947227 (Effects of BBT Versus Diaphragmatic Breathing on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients With COPD), which is not on this map. Cited by 229 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
229citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05947227 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of BBT Versus Diaphragmatic Breathing on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients With COPD

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled48ConditionsBreathing TechniqueArmsButeyko breathing technique, Diaphragmatic breathing technique.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

229 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler COPD Triple Therapy in Spain: IMPACT Trial.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

169 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ike IheanachoMeta Research, Evidera, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1585-8099
Shiyuan ZhangValue Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Collegeville, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8523-0419
Denise KingValue Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Brentford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2867-0068
Maria RizzoMeta Research, Evidera, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5741-0199
Afisi S IsmailaValue Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Collegeville, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2876-8308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects over 250 million people globally, carrying a notable economic burden. This systematic literature review aimed to highlight the economic burden associated with moderate-to-very severe COPD and to investigate key drivers of healthcare resource utilization (HRU), direct costs and indirect costs for this patient population. Materials and Methods: Relevant publications published between January 1, 2006 and November 14, 2016 were captured from the Embase, MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process databases. Supplemental searches from relevant 2015-2016 conferences were also performed. Titles and abstracts were reviewed by two independent researchers against pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were grouped by the type of economic outcome presented (HRU or costs). Where possible, data were also grouped according to COPD severity and/or patient exacerbation history. Results: In total, 73 primary publications were included in this review: 66 reported HRU, 22 reported direct costs and one reported indirect costs. Most of the studies (94%) reported on data from either Europe or North America. Trends were noted across multiple studies for higher direct costs (including mean costs per patient per year and mean costs per exacerbation) being associated with increasingly severe COPD and/or a history of more frequent or severe exacerbations. Similar trends were noted according to COPD severity and/or exacerbation history for rate of hospitalization and primary care visits. Multivariate analyses were reported by 29 studies and demonstrated the statistical significance of these associations. Several other drivers of increased costs and HRU were highlighted for patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD, including comorbidities, and treatment history. Conclusion: Moderate-to-very severe COPD represents a considerable economic burden for healthcare providers despite the availability of efficacious treatments and comprehensive guidelines on their use. Further research is warranted to ensure cost-efficient COPD management, to improve treatments and ease budgetary pressures.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth Care CostsDisease ProgressionHumansObservational Studies as TopicPrognosisPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSeverity of Illness Indexchronic obstructive pulmonary diseasecost of illnesseconomic burdenhealthcare utilizationreviewsystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID32161455
PMCPMC7049777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.