Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32161450›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2020

A Comparison of the Effects of Teach-Back and Motivational Interviewing on the Adherence to Medical Regimen in Patients with Hypertension.

Soheila Zabolypour, Maryam Alishapour, Mohammad Behnammoghadam, Rozina Abbasi Larki, Mohammad Zoladl

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05695014 (On the Effect of Discharge Education on Discharge Readiness and Satisfaction Given by Teach Back Method to Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05695014 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

On the Effect of Discharge Education on Discharge Readiness and Satisfaction Given by Teach Back Method to Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorEastern Mediterranean UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled68ConditionsDisc HerniationArmsTeach Back Metod
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soheila ZabolypourMedical Surgical Nursing Department, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
Maryam AlishapourStudent Research Committee, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
Mohammad BehnammoghadamCritical Department, Nursing School, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
Rozina Abbasi LarkiUrology Department, Medicine Faculty, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4908-8886
Mohammad ZoladlSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
Yasuj University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveArterial hypertension is considered a chronic medical problem and also a challenging condition. The present study aimed to compare the effects of motivational interviewing and teach-back on people with hypertension. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this clinical trial conducted in Yasuj in 2018 a total of 81 patients with essential hypertension were selected in terms of the inclusion criteria. Then, they were randomly divided into three groups: teach-back (Group 1), motivational interviewing (Group 2), and control (Group 3). Three teach-back sessions were held for the teach-back group, five sessions of motivational interviewing for the motivational interviewing group, and the routine care was provided for the control group. In addition, data were collected by the demographic form and scale of Adherence to Systemic Hypertension Treatment, which were completed by participants of all three groups at baseline and also two months from the intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21 by applying descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, and Bonferroni test.

findingsTwo months from the interventions, in Group 1, the score of adherence to the hypertension treatment regimen significantly increased by 816.38 points compared to the control group, in Group 2 by 1228.9 points compared to the control group, and in Group 2 by 412.6 points compared to Group 1 (p >0.05).

conclusionBoth teach-back and motivational interviewing increased the adherence to the hypertension treatment regimen; however, motivational interviewing was more effective compared to teach-back in boosting adherence to the hypertension treatment regimen.

Indexed as

adherencehypertensionmotivational interviewteach-back

Identifiers

PMID32161450
PMCPMC7049851
OpenAlexW3007603701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.