Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32161447›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2020

Pleiotropic Anticancer Properties of Scorpion Venom Peptides:

Arthur G Mikaelian, Eric Traboulay, Xiaofei Michael Zhang, Emma Yeritsyan, Peter L Pedersen, Young Hee Ko, Khalid Z Matalka

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Potential anti-tumor effects ofFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Arthur G MikaelianMedolife Corporation, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
Eric TraboulayMedolife Corporation, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3797-439X
Xiaofei Michael ZhangMedolife Corporation, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
Emma YeritsyanYerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia.
Peter L PedersenJohns Hopkins University, School of Medicine Laboratory, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Young Hee KoJohns Hopkins University, School of Medicine Laboratory, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Khalid Z MatalkaOncoTherapeutica, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USOncotherapeutics (United States) · USYerevan State Medical University · AM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, the success of conventional chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted biological therapies in cancer treatment is not satisfactory. The main reasons for such outcomes rely on low target selectivity, primarily in chemo- and radiotherapy, ineffectiveness to metastatic disease, drug resistance, and severe side effects. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors may offer better clinical promise, success is still limited. Since cancer is a complex systemic disease, the need for new therapeutic modalities that can target or block several steps of cancer cell characteristics, modulate or repolarize immune cells, and are less toxic to healthy tissues is essential. Of these promising therapeutic modalities are pleiotropic natural products in which scorpion venom (SV) is an excellent example. SV consists of complex bioactive peptides that are disulfide-rich of different peptides' length, potent, stable, and exerts various multi-pharmacological actions. SV peptides also contain ion channel inhibitors. These ion channels are dysregulated and overexpressed in cancer cells, and play essential roles in cancer development and invasion, as well as depolarizing immune cells. Furthermore, SV has been found to induce cancer cell apoptosis, and inhibit cancer cells proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. In the current review, we are presenting data that show the pleiotropic effect of SV against different types of human cancer as well as revealing one potential anticancer agent, Rhopalurus princeps venom. Furthermore, we are addressing what is needed to be done to translate these potential cancer therapeutics to the clinic.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell ProliferationDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansPeptidesScorpionsScorpion VenomsAntineoplastic AgentsPeptidesScorpion Venomsangiogenesisapoptosiscell arrestcytotoxicityimmunomodulationion channelsmetastasispolarization

Identifiers

PMID32161447
PMCPMC7051175
OpenAlexW3007455648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.