ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2020
Comparative Assessment of Distribution Characteristics and Ocular Pharmacokinetics of Norvancomycin Between Continuous Topical Ocular Instillation and Hourly Administration of Eye Drop.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of Severe Acute Bacterial Keratitis in Rabbits Using Continuous Topical Ocular Instillation with Norvancomycin.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the distribution characteristics and ocular pharmacokinetics of norvancomycin (NVCM) in ocular tissues of the anterior segment between continuous topical ocular instillation and hourly administration of eye drop in rabbits.
methodsSixty rabbits were randomly divided into two groups: continuous topical ocular instillation drug delivery (CTOIDD) group and eye drop (control) group. In the CTOIDD group, NVCM solution (50 mg/mL) was perfused to the ocular surface using the CTOIDD system at 2 mL/h up to 10 h and the same solution was administered at one drop (50 μL) per hour for 10 h in the control group. Animals (N=6 per time-point per group) were humanely killed at 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 h to analyze their ocular tissues and plasma. The concentrations of NVCM in the conjunctiva, cornea, aqueous humour, iris, ciliary body and plasma were measured by HPLC with photodiode array detector. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by Kinetica 5.1.
resultsThe highest concentrations of NVCM for the CTOIDD group and control group were 2105.45±919.89 μg/g and 97.18±43.14 μg/g in cornea, 3033.92±1061.95 μg/g and 806.99±563.02 μg/g in conjunctiva, 1570.19±402.87 μg/g and 46.93±23.46 μg/g in iris, 181.94±47.11 μg/g and 15.38±4.00 μg/g in ciliary body, 29.78±4.90 μg/mL and 3.20±1.48 μg/mL in aqueous humour, and 26.89±5.57 μg/mL and 1.90±1.87 μg/mL in plasma, respectively. The mean NVCM levels significantly increased at all time-points in cornea, iris, and ciliary body (
conclusionSince continuous instillation of NVCM with CTOIDD could reach significantly higher concentrations and was sustained for a longer period compared with hourly administration of eye drop, CTOIDD administered NVCM could be a possible method to treat bacterial keratitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.