Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32161378›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020

Integrated genomic characterization of ERBB2/HER2 alterations in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on unusual FISH groups.

Soo-Ryum Yang, Yosr Bouhlal, Francisco M De La Vega, Morgan Ballard, Calvin J Kuo, Anna Vilborg, Greg Jensen, Kimberly Allison

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Detection of ERBB2 amplification in uterine serous carcinoma by next-generation sequencing: an approach highly concordant with standard assays.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soo-Ryum YangDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1051-502X
Yosr BouhlalTOMA Biosciences, Holland, MI, USA.
Francisco M De La VegaTOMA Biosciences, Holland, MI, USA.
Morgan BallardDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Calvin J KuoDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Anna VilborgTOMA Biosciences, Holland, MI, USA.
Greg JensenTOMA Biosciences, Holland, MI, USA.
Kimberly AllisonDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. allisonk@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with invasive breast cancer, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for HER2 typically demonstrates the clear presence or lack of ERBB2 (HER2) amplification (i.e., groups 1 or 5). However, a small subset of patients can present with unusual HER2 FISH patterns (groups 2-4), resulting in diagnostic confusion. To provide clarity, the 2018 CAP/ASCO HER2 testing guideline recommends additional testing using HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) for determining the final HER2 status. Despite this effort, the genomic correlates of unusual HER2 FISH groups remain poorly understood. Here, we used droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to characterize the genomic features of both usual and unusual HER2 FISH groups. In this study, 51 clinical samples were selected to represent FISH groups 1-5. Furthermore, group 1 was subdivided into two groups, with groups 1A and 1B corresponding to cases with HER2 signals/cell ≥6.0 and 4-6, respectively. Overall, our findings revealed a wide range of copy number alterations in HER2 across the different FISH groups. As expected, groups 1A and 5 showed the clear presence and lack of HER2 copy number gain, respectively, as measured by ddPCR and NGS. In contrast, group 1B and other uncommon FISH groups (groups 2-4) were characterized by a broader range of HER2 copy levels with only a few select cases showing high-level gain. Notably, these cases with increased HER2 copy levels also showed HER2 overexpression by IHC, thus highlighting the correlation between HER2 copy number and HER2 protein expression. Given the concordance between the genomic and protein results, our findings suggest that HER2 IHC may inform HER2 copy number status in patients with unusual FISH patterns. Hence, our results support the current recommendation for using IHC to resolve HER2 status in FISH groups 2-4.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNABiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID32161378
OpenAlexW3012344776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.