Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32160925›Full record

GuidelineJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2020

Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update : Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post-Processing.

Jeanette Schulz-Menger, David A Bluemke, Jens Bremerich, Scott D Flamm, Mark A Fogel, Matthias G Friedrich, Raymond J Kim, Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Christopher M Kramer, Dudley J Pennell and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 572 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
572citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05632432 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Autologous Atrial Appendage Micrografts Transplanted During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: the AAMS2 Randomized, Double-blinded, and Placebo-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital District of Helsinki and UusimaaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsIschemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Cardiomyopathy, Heart Failure, Systolic, Heart Failure NYHA Class IIIArmsEpicardial AAMs-patch transplantation, RNA-stabilized whole blood sampling, Plasma sampling, Transthoracic echocardiography, Late-gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMRI)
NCT06309862 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Association of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Cancer With Early Myocardial Tissue and Biomarker Changes During Treatment - Implication for Risk of Myocarditis and Cardiomyopathy

TypeobservationalSponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRan2024 to 2025Enrolled15ConditionsCardio-Oncology, Cardiomyopathy Due to Drug
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

572 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance reference values ("normal values") in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 2025 update.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article

512 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jeanette Schulz-MengerDepartment of Cardiology and Nephrology, Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, and HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany. jeanette.schulz-menger@charite.de.
David A BluemkeUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA.
Jens BremerichDepartment of Radiology of the University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Scott D FlammImaging, and Heart and Vascular Institutes, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mark A FogelDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Matthias G FriedrichDepartments of Medicine and Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Raymond J KimDuke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center, and Departments of Medicine and Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Florian von Knobelsdorff-BrenkenhoffDepartment of Cardiology, Academic Teaching Hospital Agatharied of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Hausham, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0745-6062
Christopher M KramerDepartments of Medicine and Radiology and the Cardiovascular Imaging Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Dudley J PennellRoyal Brompton Hospital, and Imperial College, London, UK.
Sven PleinLeeds Institute for Genetics Health and Therapeutics & Leeds Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Eike NagelInstitute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research) Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, partner site RheinMain, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With mounting data on its accuracy and prognostic value, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is becoming an increasingly important diagnostic tool with growing utility in clinical routine. Given its versatility and wide range of quantitative parameters, however, agreement on specific standards for the interpretation and post-processing of CMR studies is required to ensure consistent quality and reproducibility of CMR reports. This document addresses this need by providing consensus recommendations developed by the Task Force for Post-Processing of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR). The aim of the Task Force is to recommend requirements and standards for image interpretation and post-processing enabling qualitative and quantitative evaluation of CMR images. Furthermore, pitfalls of CMR image analysis are discussed where appropriate. It is an update of the original recommendations published 2013.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesConsensusHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsHeartImage interpretationMagnetic resonance imagingPost-processingRecommendations

Identifiers

PMID32160925
PMCPMC7066763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.